Player Dossier

2015-2020

Tulsa

Zach Smith

QB • 6'3" • 227 lbs • Grandview, TX, USA

Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator

Zach Smith is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.5 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

11.5

Efficiency

52.5

Consistency

73.6

Season Value

49.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Tulsa

15161617192020

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Baylor • Tulsa
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: South Florida

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Zach Smith, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · Tulsa. Zach Smith is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.5 usage in the latest tracked season.

Zach Smith played QB for Baylor and Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Zach Smith recorded 8,222 passing yards, -263 rushing yards, and 3 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Tulsa.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 3,183 primary output with 56.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 52.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Baylor, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Florida

Win with 233 yards of offense and 77 efficiency. It landed in the 55.6th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · Tulsa

Games

9

Primary Metric / G

209.3

Efficiency

52.5

Usage

11.5

Consistency

73.6

Best Game by takeover score

South Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 348. Oklahoma State: 165. UCF: 251. South Florida: 233. East Carolina: 261. SMU: 306. Tulane: 6. Navy: 169. Cincinnati: 145

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 56 by 50.7. Oklahoma State: 33 by 50.2. UCF: 32 by 55.8. South Florida: 24 by 77. East Carolina: 43 by 50. SMU: 44 by 57.3. Tulane: 8 by 39.2. Navy: 26 by 51.5. Cincinnati: 33 by 40.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins204.3 · Games = 6 · -15 vs Losses
Losses219.3 · Games = 3 · +15 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

9 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

South Florida

Best efficiency game

77 vs South Florida

Result
Thu 12/31@ Mississippi State300-yard gameL 26-28264634756.51250.71010.1009
Sun 12/20@ CincinnatiL 24-27133016643.31240.73-21-700
Sat 12/5@ NavyW 19-6102516840.01051.511101
Fri 11/20vs TulaneW 30-24261733.30039.22-11-5.5001
Sun 11/15vs SMU300-yard game · 3+ TDW 28-24263832568.43157.36-19-3.2005
Sat 10/31vs East CarolinaW 34-30193725351.42250681.30016
Fri 10/23@ South FloridaW 42-13162423366.71177
Sat 10/3@ UCF3+ TDW 34-26172927358.63155.83-22-7.3000
Sat 9/19@ Oklahoma StateL 7-16182816464.31150.2510.2006

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Baylor

    2015-2017

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Tulsa

    2019-2020

    Final stop

Season Value Progression

2015201620162017201920202020
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2015 Regular SeasonBaylor0
2016 PostseasonBaylor1,50051.5101,500
2016 Regular SeasonBaylor1,50051.5100
2017 Regular SeasonBaylor1,39246.912.8-108
2019 Regular SeasonTulsa3,18356.317.31,791
2020 PostseasonTulsa1,88452.511.5-1,299
2020 Regular SeasonTulsa1,88452.511.50

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

South Florida

Win with 233 yards of offense and 77 efficiency.

233

Primary metric

233 total offense with 77 efficiency.

#2

Houston

355

Primary metric

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.

355 total offense with 54.3 efficiency.

#3

Oklahoma

440

Primary metric

Loss with 440 yards of offense and 60.8 efficiency.

440 total offense with 60.8 efficiency.

#4

Boise State

377

Primary metric

Win with 377 yards of offense and 61.1 efficiency.

377 total offense with 61.1 efficiency.

#5

San José State

306

Primary metric

Win with 306 yards of offense and 84 efficiency.

306 total offense with 84 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2019 Regular Season · Tulsa

3,183 primary output · 56.3 efficiency · 17.3 usage

63.9

#2

2020 Postseason · Tulsa

49.2

1,884 primary · 52.5 efficiency · 11.5 usage

#3

2020 Regular Season · Tulsa

49.2

1,884 primary · 52.5 efficiency · 11.5 usage

Milestones

19

250+ passing yards

11

300+ total offense

9

3+ TD games

9

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

7,959

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.