Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Michigan paired 2,851 primary output with 65.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Shea Patterson College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 9,254
- Passing yards
- 8,770
- Rushing yards
- 484
- Touchdowns
- 76
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 3 | 1,049 | 880 | 169 | 6 | 65.3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 7 | 2,243 | 2,259 | -16 | 18 | 64.3 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 219 | 206 | 13 | 1 | 69.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 2,632 | 2,364 | 268 | 23 | 69.2 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 237 | 233 | 4 | 1 | 68.7 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 2,874 | 2,828 | 46 | 27 | 68.7 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 369 yards of offense and 67.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
239.3
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
17.6
Consistency
78.2
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 237. Middle Tennessee: 231. Army: 189. Wisconsin: 218. Rutgers: 280. Iowa: 172. Illinois: 211. Penn State: 310. Notre Dame: 102. Maryland: 156. Michigan State: 369. Indiana: 351. Ohio State: 285
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 45 by 45.5. Middle Tennessee: 38 by 62. Army: 37 by 56.3. Wisconsin: 35 by 47.1. Rutgers: 27 by 66.6. Iowa: 33 by 55.3. Illinois: 27 by 64.4. Penn State: 53 by 58.3. Notre Dame: 23 by 55.3. Maryland: 24 by 60.3. Michigan State: 41 by 67.4. Indiana: 35 by 61.3. Ohio State: 50 by 47.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins229 · Games = 9 · -33.5 vs Losses
Losses262.5 · Games = 4 · +33.5 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Shea Patterson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.