Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2014-2019Michigan
Shea Patterson
QB • 6'2" • 202 lbs • Shreveport, LA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Shea Patterson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
78.2
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Michigan
1415161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ole Miss • Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shea Patterson, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Michigan. Shea Patterson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Shea Patterson played QB for Ole Miss and Michigan. Across 6 tracked seasons, Shea Patterson recorded 8,770 passing yards, 484 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Michigan paired 2,851 primary output with 65.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 369 yards of offense and 67.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
239.3
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
17.6
Consistency
78.2
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 237. Middle Tennessee: 231. Army: 189. Wisconsin: 218. Rutgers: 280. Iowa: 172. Illinois: 211. Penn State: 310. Notre Dame: 102. Maryland: 156. Michigan State: 369. Indiana: 351. Ohio State: 285
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 45 by 45.5. Middle Tennessee: 38 by 62. Army: 37 by 56.3. Wisconsin: 35 by 47.1. Rutgers: 27 by 66.6. Iowa: 33 by 55.3. Illinois: 27 by 64.4. Penn State: 53 by 58.3. Notre Dame: 23 by 55.3. Maryland: 24 by 60.3. Michigan State: 41 by 67.4. Indiana: 35 by 61.3. Ohio State: 50 by 47.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins229 · Games = 9 · -33.5 vs Losses
Losses262.5 · Games = 4 · +33.5 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
67.4 vs Michigan State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 16-35 | 17 | 37 | 233 | 45.9 | 1 | 2 | 45.5 | 8 | 4 | 0.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State300-yard game | L 27-56 | 18 | 43 | 305 | 41.9 | 1 | 1 | 47.9 | 7 | -20 | -2.90 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Indiana300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 39-14 | 20 | 32 | 366 | 62.5 | 5 | 1 | 61.3 | 3 | -15 | -5 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Michigan State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 44-10 | 24 | 33 | 384 | 72.7 | 4 | 0 | 67.4 | 8 | -15 | -1.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Maryland | W 38-7 | 13 | 22 | 151 | 59.1 | 1 | 0 | 60.3 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-14 | 6 | 12 | 100 | 50.0 | 2 | 0 | 55.3 | 11 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Penn State | L 21-28 | 24 | 41 | 276 | 58.5 | 0 | 1 | 58.3 | 12 | 34 | 2.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Illinois3+ TD | W 42-25 | 11 | 22 | 194 | 50.0 | 3 | 0 | 64.4 | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Iowa | W 10-3 | 14 | 26 | 147 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 55.3 | 7 | 25 | 3.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Rutgers3+ TD | W 52-0 | 17 | 23 | 276 | 73.9 | 1 | 1 | 66.6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | 14 | 32 | 219 | 43.8 | 2 | 1 | 47.1 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army | W 24-21 | 19 | 29 | 207 | 65.5 | 0 | 0 | 56.3 | 8 | -18 | -2.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Middle Tennessee3+ TD | W 40-21 | 17 | 29 | 203 | 58.6 | 3 | 0 | 62 | 9 | 28 | 3.10 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2014-2017
Opening stop
- 2
Michigan
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Value Progression
20142015201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,049 | 60.6 | 38.1 | 1,049 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 2,243 | 55.3 | 23.8 | 1,194 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 2,851 | 65.7 | 14.9 | 608 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 2,851 | 65.7 | 14.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 3,111 | 57.5 | 17.6 | 260 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 3,111 | 57.5 | 17.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with 260 yards of offense and 82.3 efficiency.
260
Primary metric
260 total offense with 82.3 efficiency.
#2
Texas A&M
402
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
402 total offense with 64.9 efficiency.
#3
Mississippi State
393
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
393 total offense with 62.8 efficiency.
#4
Indiana
318
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
318 total offense with 73.2 efficiency.
#5
UT Martin
495
Primary metric
Win with 495 yards of offense and 68.7 efficiency.
495 total offense with 68.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Michigan
2,851 primary output · 65.7 efficiency · 14.9 usage
64.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
64.6
2,851 primary · 65.7 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
63.3
3,111 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 17.6 usage
Milestones
15
250+ passing yards
11
300+ total offense
14
3+ TD games
19
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
9,254
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Shea Patterson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.