Usage Score
25.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Vanderbilt
Kalija Lipscomb
WR • 6'1" • 201 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Kalija Lipscomb reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.1
Consistency
64.3
Season Value
51.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Vanderbilt
161617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kalija Lipscomb, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Kalija Lipscomb reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 916 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
51.1
Efficiency
64.1
Usage
25.5
Consistency
64.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 8. Purdue: 98. LSU: 68. Northern Illinois: 100. Ole Miss: 69. Missouri: 34. Florida: 4. Kentucky: 12. Unknown: 75. Tennessee: 43
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 3 by 17.8. Purdue: 8 by 81.7. LSU: 5 by 90.7. Northern Illinois: 8 by 83.3. Ole Miss: 7 by 65.7. Missouri: 1 by 100. Florida: 1 by 26.7. Kentucky: 4 by 20. Unknown: 6 by 83.3. Tennessee: 4 by 71.7
Split Comparison
Wins67 · n=2 · +23.9 vs Losses
Losses43.1 · n=7 · -23.9 vs Wins
First Half68.6 · n=5 · +35.0 vs Second Half
Second Half33.6 · n=5 · -35.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Tennessee | L 10-28 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 75 | 11.3 | 12.50 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Kentucky | L 14-38 | — | 4 | 12 | 6.8 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Florida | L 0-56 | — | 1 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Missouri | W 21-14 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ole Miss | L 6-31 | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-18 | — | 8 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs LSU | L 38-66 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ PurdueHigh volume | L 24-42 | — | 8 | 98 | 12.7 | 12.30 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Georgia | L 6-30 | — | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 2.70 | 0 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 319 | 78.6 | 15.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 319 | 78.6 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 610 | 92.7 | 16.8 | 291 |
| 2018 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 916 | 67.8 | 32.7 | 306 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 916 | 67.8 | 32.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 511 | 64.1 | 25.5 | -405 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
174
Primary metric
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
128
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Vanderbilt
916 primary output · 67.8 efficiency · 32.7 usage
66.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
66.3
916 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 32.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
61.7
610 primary · 92.7 efficiency · 16.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
8
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8504
McGill Toolen · Mobile, AL
- Committed To
- South Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,356
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.