Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2016-2017Tennessee
WR • 6'6" • 198 lbs • Leavenworth, KS, USA
Jeff George reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.3
Efficiency
73.3
Consistency
37.8
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff George, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Tennessee. Jeff George reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeff George played WR for Tennessee. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jeff George recorded 200 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 180 primary output with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
25.7
Efficiency
73.3
Usage
8.3
Consistency
37.8
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana State: 28. Massachusetts: 6. Georgia: 7. Kentucky: 59. Missouri: 5. LSU: 60. Vanderbilt: 15
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana State: 2 by 93.3. Massachusetts: 1 by 40. Georgia: 1 by 46.7. Kentucky: 2 by 100. Missouri: 1 by 33.3. LSU: 1 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Tennessee | 20 | 100 | 4.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tennessee | 180 | 73.3 | 8.3 | 160 |
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tennessee Tech
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana State
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Vanderbilt
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Tennessee
180 primary output · 73.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
54.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Tennessee
53.9
20 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
200
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.