Player Stats

Benny Snell Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,074
Rushing yards
3,858
Receiving yards
216
Touchdowns
49

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2016 PostseasonKentucky13453411066.8
2016 Regular SeasonKentucky131,0851,057281366.8
2017 PostseasonKentucky1315150177.6
2017 Regular SeasonKentucky131,3901,318721877.6
2018 PostseasonKentucky131441440282.7
2018 Regular SeasonKentucky131,3951,2901051582.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Kentucky paired 1,539 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 51.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Kentucky

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

118.4

Efficiency

51.9

Usage

42.9

Consistency

78.8

Best Game by takeover score

Florida

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 144. Central Michigan: 132. Florida: 183. Murray State: 75. Mississippi State: 165. South Carolina: 99. Texas A&M: 78. Vanderbilt: 169. Missouri: 95. Georgia: 78. Tennessee: 106. Middle Tennessee: 115. Louisville: 100

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 26 by 57.7. Central Michigan: 21 by 65.3. Florida: 29 by 66.8. Murray State: 15 by 52.1. Mississippi State: 25 by 68.8. South Carolina: 29 by 33.2. Texas A&M: 17 by 48. Vanderbilt: 32 by 55. Missouri: 21 by 40.9. Georgia: 21 by 38.3. Tennessee: 26 by 42.3. Middle Tennessee: 25 by 47.9. Louisville: 18 by 57.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins127.7 · Games = 10 · +40.4 vs Losses
Losses87.3 · Games = 3 · -40.4 vs Wins