Usage Score
42.9
Player Dossier
2016-2018Kentucky
RB • 5'11" • 223 lbs • Westerville, OH, USA
Benny Snell Jr. leans workhorse runner traits and 51.9 efficiency.
Usage Score
42.9
Efficiency
51.9
Consistency
78.8
Season Value
68.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Benny Snell Jr., RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Kentucky. Benny Snell Jr. leans workhorse runner traits and 51.9 efficiency.
Benny Snell Jr. played RB for Kentucky. Across 3 tracked seasons, Benny Snell Jr. recorded 59 passing yards, 3,858 rushing yards, and 216 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Kentucky.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Kentucky paired 1,539 primary output with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
118.4
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
42.9
Consistency
78.8
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 144. Central Michigan: 132. Florida: 183. Murray State: 75. Mississippi State: 165. South Carolina: 99. Texas A&M: 78. Vanderbilt: 169. Missouri: 95. Georgia: 78. Tennessee: 106. Middle Tennessee: 115. Louisville: 100
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 26 by 57.7. Central Michigan: 21 by 65.3. Florida: 29 by 66.8. Murray State: 15 by 52.1. Mississippi State: 25 by 68.8. South Carolina: 29 by 33.2. Texas A&M: 17 by 48. Vanderbilt: 32 by 55. Missouri: 21 by 40.9. Georgia: 21 by 38.3. Tennessee: 26 by 42.3. Middle Tennessee: 25 by 47.9. Louisville: 18 by 57.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
68.8 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Penn State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 27-24 | 26 | 144 | 5.50 | 2 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Louisville100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 56-10 | 18 | 100 | 5.60 | 2 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Middle Tennessee100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 34-23 | 25 | 115 | 4.60 | 2 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tennessee | L 7-24 | 20 | 81 | 4.10 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Georgia | L 17-34 | 20 | 73 | 3.70 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Missouri | W 15-14 | 19 | 67 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 28 | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Vanderbilt100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 14-7 | 32 | 169 | 5.30 | 1 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-20 | 13 | 60 | 4.60 | 0 | 4 | 18 | 4.6 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs South Carolina | W 24-10 | 28 | 85 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 28-7 | 25 | 165 | 6.60 | 4 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Murray State | W 48-10 | 15 | 75 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Florida100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 27-16 | 27 | 175 | 6.50 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Central Michigan100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 35-20 | 20 | 125 | 6.30 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 6.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kentucky
2016-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 1,130 | 60.8 | 23.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 1,130 | 60.8 | 23.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Kentucky | 1,405 | 50.4 | 39.5 | 275 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kentucky | 1,405 | 50.4 | 39.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Kentucky | 1,539 | 51.9 | 42.9 | 134 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kentucky | 1,539 | 51.9 | 42.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
211
Primary metric
211 scrimmage yards and 56.9 usage.
#2
Florida
183
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
183 scrimmage yards and 55.8 usage.
#3
Tennessee
180
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
180 scrimmage yards and 62.8 usage.
#4
Austin Peay
152
Primary metric
Win with 152 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
152 scrimmage yards and 32.6 usage.
#5
Vanderbilt
169
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169 scrimmage yards and 59.3 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Kentucky
1,539 primary output · 51.9 efficiency · 42.9 usage
68.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Kentucky
68.4
1,539 primary · 51.9 efficiency · 42.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Kentucky
62.4
1,405 primary · 50.4 efficiency · 39.5 usage
19
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
15
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8525
Jesuit · Tampa, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,074
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.