Usage Score
25.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018UCLA
Caleb Wilson
TE • 6'4" • 235 lbs • Gardena, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Caleb Wilson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.4
Consistency
67.6
Season Value
70.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UCLA
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- USC • UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Caleb Wilson, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · UCLA. Caleb Wilson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Caleb Wilson played TE for USC and UCLA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Caleb Wilson recorded 39 passing yards, 4 rushing yards, and 1,675 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with UCLA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UCLA paired 965 primary output with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across USC, UCLA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Stanford
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · UCLA
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
87.7
Efficiency
87.4
Usage
25.9
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 36. Oklahoma: 92. Colorado: 13. Washington: 102. California: 92. Arizona: 82. Utah: 62. Oregon: 75. Arizona State: 164. USC: 63. Stanford: 184
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 4 by 60. Oklahoma: 4 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 43.3. Washington: 8 by 85. California: 5 by 100. Arizona: 6 by 91.1. Utah: 5 by 82.7. Oregon: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 11 by 99.4. USC: 4 by 100. Stanford: 9 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins79 · Games = 3 · -12 vs Losses
Losses91 · Games = 8 · +12 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Stanford
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-49 | — | 9 | 184 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 0 | 66 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs USC | W 34-27 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Arizona State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-31 | — | 11 | 164 | 14.9 | 14.90 | 2 | 33 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Oregon | L 21-42 | — | 2 | 75 | 37.5 | 37.50 | 1 | 63 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Utah | L 10-41 | — | 5 | 62 | 11 | 12.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs Arizona | W 31-30 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ California | W 30-7 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Washington100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-31 | — | 8 | 102 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Colorado | L 16-38 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Oklahoma | L 21-49 | — | 4 | 92 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 65 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-26 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2015
Opening stop
- 2
UCLA
2016-2018
Final stop
Season Value Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 220 | 71.1 | 10.6 | 220 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCLA | 490 | 82.5 | 22.6 | 270 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UCLA | 965 | 87.4 | 25.9 | 475 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
208
Primary metric
208 receiving yards with a 92.4 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
184
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
164
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 99.4 efficiency score.
#4
California
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
California
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · UCLA
965 primary output · 87.4 efficiency · 25.9 usage
70.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · UCLA
50.4
490 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 22.6 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
38
220 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,675
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Caleb Wilson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.