Usage Score
29
Player Dossier
2015-2018Arizona
Shun Brown
WR • 5'10" • 177 lbs • Shreveport, LA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Shun Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.1
Consistency
62.6
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Arizona
1516171718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shun Brown, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Postseason · Arizona. Shun Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Shun Brown played WR for Arizona. Across 4 tracked seasons, Shun Brown recorded 147 rushing yards, 1,773 receiving yards, and 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Arizona.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Arizona paired 573 primary output with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Utah
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Arizona
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
54.6
Efficiency
68.1
Usage
29
Consistency
62.6
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 11. Houston: 73. Southern Utah: 97. Oregon State: 42. USC: 81. California: 38. Utah: 43. UCLA: 4. Oregon: 96. Colorado: 57. Washington State: 37. Arizona State: 76
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 1 by 73.3. Houston: 9 by 54.1. Southern Utah: 5 by 100. Oregon State: 3 by 93.3. USC: 5 by 100. California: 4 by 63.3. Utah: 8 by 35.8. UCLA: 1 by 26.7. Oregon: 10 by 64. Colorado: 5 by 76. Washington State: 8 by 30.8. Arizona State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins66 · Games = 5 · +19.6 vs Losses
Losses46.4 · Games = 7 · -19.6 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Arizona State | L 40-41 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Washington StateHigh volume | L 28-69 | — | 8 | 37 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Colorado | W 42-34 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 10/28 | vs OregonHigh volume | W 44-15 | — | 10 | 96 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 10/21 | @ UCLA | L 30-31 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ UtahHigh volume | L 10-42 | — | 8 | 43 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/7 | vs California | W 24-17 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs USC | L 20-24 | — | 5 | 81 | 14 | 16.20 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Oregon State | W 35-14 | — | 3 | 42 | 17.3 | 14 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 9/16 | vs Southern Utah2+ TD | W 62-31 | — | 5 | 97 | 20.2 | 19.40 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ HoustonHigh volume | L 18-45 | — | 9 | 73 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs BYU | L 23-28 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20152016201720172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona | 24 | 53.3 | 5.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 521 | 84.8 | 21 | 497 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona | 573 | 82.6 | 25.3 | 52 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 573 | 82.6 | 25.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona | 655 | 68.1 | 29 | 82 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Utah
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
USC
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 65 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 64 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Postseason · Arizona
573 primary output · 82.6 efficiency · 25.3 usage
66.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Arizona
66.7
573 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 25.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Arizona
64.9
655 primary · 68.1 efficiency · 29 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,773
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Shun Brown
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.