Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2015-2018Stanford
ILB • 6'3" • 224 lbs • North Salt Lake, UT, USA
Sean Barton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.7
Efficiency
34.9
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
16.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sean Barton, ILB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Stanford. Sean Barton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.9 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Stanford paired 7.5 primary output with 34.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
34.9
Usage
7.7
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 1. San Diego State: 0. USC: 2. Unknown: 0. Oregon: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 1. Washington State: 0.5. Washington: 1. Oregon State: 0. UCLA: 2. California: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 8 by 43.3. San Diego State: 9 by 37.5. USC: 10 by 61.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Oregon: 8 by 33.3. Notre Dame: 9 by 37.5. Utah: 4 by 16.7. Arizona State: 4 by 26.7. Washington State: 10 by 46.7. Washington: 7 by 39.2. Oregon State: 4 by 16.7. UCLA: 7 by 49.2. California: 9 by 37.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Pittsburgh | W 14-13 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ California | W 23-13 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCLA | W 49-42 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Oregon State | W 48-17 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Washington | L 23-27 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Washington State10+ tackles | L 38-41 | 10 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/19 | @ Arizona State | W 20-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/7 | vs Utah | L 21-40 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-38 | 9 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Oregon | W 38-31 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | vs USC10+ tackles | W 17-3 | 10 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs San Diego State | W 31-10 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 7.5 | 18.7 | 6.4 | 7.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 7.5 | 18.7 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 2 | 26.1 | 7.2 | -5.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Stanford | 7.5 | 34.9 | 7.7 | 5.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 7.5 | 34.9 | 7.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
USC
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#2
California
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
#3
Rice
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#4
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.6 takeover score.
#5
Arizona
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Stanford
7.5 primary output · 34.9 efficiency · 7.7 usage
16.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Stanford
16.8
7.5 primary · 34.9 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Stanford
12
7.5 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 6.4 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2013 · Rating 0.8808
Woods Cross · Woods Cross, UT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
141
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sean Barton quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit