Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2015-2018Stanford
JJ Arcega-Whiteside
WR • 6'3" • 221 lbs • Inman, SC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
JJ Arcega-Whiteside reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
68.8
Season Value
70.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Stanford
15161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
JJ Arcega-Whiteside, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Stanford. JJ Arcega-Whiteside reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Stanford paired 1,040 primary output with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San Diego State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Stanford
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
86.7
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
27
Consistency
68.8
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 90. San Diego State: 226. USC: 62. Unknown: 36. Oregon: 84. Notre Dame: 30. Utah: 103. Arizona State: 91. Washington State: 92. Washington: 11. UCLA: 106. California: 109
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 3 by 100. San Diego State: 6 by 100. USC: 4 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 80. Oregon: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 5 by 40. Utah: 8 by 85.8. Arizona State: 7 by 86.7. Washington State: 9 by 68.1. Washington: 1 by 73.3. UCLA: 7 by 100. California: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins109.7 · n=7 · +50.7 vs Losses
Losses59 · n=4 · -50.7 vs Wins
First Half88 · n=6 · +2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half85.3 · n=6 · -2.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
San Diego State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Pittsburgh | W 14-13 | — | 3 | 90 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ California100 receiving yards | W 23-13 | — | 5 | 109 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCLA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 49-42 | — | 7 | 106 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 3 | 23 |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Washington | L 23-27 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Washington StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 38-41 | — | 9 | 92 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 2 | 25 |
| Fri 10/19 | @ Arizona State | W 20-13 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 10/7 | vs Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-40 | — | 8 | 103 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-38 | — | 5 | 30 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Oregon2+ TD | W 38-31 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 19 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs USC | W 17-3 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs San Diego State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 226 | 37.7 | 37.70 | 3 | 80 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 379 | 67.8 | 18.5 | 379 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 379 | 67.8 | 18.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 781 | 88.1 | 29.1 | 402 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 781 | 88.1 | 29.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Stanford | 1,040 | 86.2 | 27 | 259 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 1,040 | 86.2 | 27 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
California
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San Diego State
226
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
226 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Stanford
1,040 primary output · 86.2 efficiency · 27 usage
70.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Stanford
70.5
1,040 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Stanford
68
781 primary · 88.1 efficiency · 29.1 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8044
Oscar Smith · Chesapeake, VA
- Committed To
- Old Dominion
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,200
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.