Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2009-2018Boston College
RB • 6'1" • 195 lbs • St. Petersburg, FL, USA
Jeff Smith leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 68.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
68.7
Consistency
36.6
Season Value
50.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Boston College
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Smith, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Boston College. Jeff Smith leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 68.7 efficiency.
Jeff Smith played RB for Boston College. Across 10 tracked seasons, Jeff Smith recorded 404 passing yards, 898 rushing yards, and 1,094 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Boston College.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Boston College paired 594 primary output with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 68.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with 187 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
45.4
Efficiency
68.7
Usage
5.2
Consistency
36.6
Best Game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Massachusetts: 74. Holy Cross: 20. Wake Forest: 187. Purdue: 6. Temple: 36. NC State: 37. Louisville: 18. Miami: 26. Virginia Tech: 18. Clemson: -7. Florida State: 61. Syracuse: 69
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Massachusetts: 7 by 94. Holy Cross: 1 by 100. Wake Forest: 9 by 100. Purdue: 2 by 31.3. Temple: 4 by 75. NC State: 2 by 62.5. Louisville: 3 by 62.5. Miami: 4 by 49. Virginia Tech: 2 by 87.5. Clemson: 1 by 0. Florida State: 4 by 62.5. Syracuse: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
100 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Syracuse | L 21-42 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 69 | 69 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Florida State | L 21-22 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 59 | 15.3 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Clemson | L 7-27 | 1 | -7 | -7 | 0 | — | — | -7 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Virginia Tech | W 31-21 | 1 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Fri 10/26 | vs Miami | W 27-14 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 6.5 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisville | W 38-20 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 1 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ NC State | L 23-28 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 18.5 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Temple | W 45-35 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 36 | 9 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Purdue | L 13-30 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Thu 9/13 | @ Wake Forest150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | W 41-34 | 3 | 42 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 145 | 20.8 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Holy Cross | W 62-14 | 1 | 20 | 20 | 0 | — | — | 20 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Massachusetts | W 55-21 | 4 | 35 | 8.80 | 0 | 3 | 39 | 10.6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Boston College
2009-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Boston College | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Boston College | 450 | 57 | 16.5 | 450 |
| 2016 Postseason | Boston College | 594 | 67.5 | 9.3 | 144 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Boston College | 594 | 67.5 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Boston College | 403 | 80.1 | 4.4 | -191 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Boston College | 403 | 80.1 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Boston College | 545 | 68.7 | 5.2 | 142 |
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Loss with 117 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
117
Primary metric
117 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#2
Wake Forest
187
Primary metric
Win with 187 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
187 scrimmage yards and 15 usage.
#3
Syracuse
76
Primary metric
Win with 76 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
76 scrimmage yards and 4.2 usage.
#4
Notre Dame
100
Primary metric
Loss with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
100 scrimmage yards and 10.4 usage.
#5
UConn
121
Primary metric
Win with 121 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
121 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Boston College
594 primary output · 67.5 efficiency · 9.3 usage
57.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · Boston College
57.1
594 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Boston College
52
450 primary · 57 efficiency · 16.5 usage
2
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
12
Seasons tracked
1,992
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 12 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.