Usage Score
19.1
Player Dossier
2015-2017South Carolina
TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Hayden Hurst reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.1
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
61.6
Season Value
60.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hayden Hurst, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · South Carolina. Hayden Hurst reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Hayden Hurst played TE for South Carolina. Across 3 tracked seasons, Hayden Hurst recorded 21 passing yards, 39 rushing yards, and 1,281 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with South Carolina.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Carolina paired 616 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
43
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
19.1
Consistency
61.6
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 41. NC State: -2. Missouri: 69. Kentucky: 39. Louisiana Tech: 39. Texas A&M: 76. Arkansas: 76. Tennessee: 0. Vanderbilt: 31. Georgia: 93. Florida: 59. Wofford: 10. Clemson: 28
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 3 by 91.1. NC State: 1 by 0. Missouri: 3 by 100. Kentucky: 4 by 65. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 86.7. Texas A&M: 6 by 84.4. Arkansas: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 4 by 51.7. Georgia: 7 by 88.6. Florida: 5 by 78.7. Wofford: 3 by 22.2. Clemson: 3 by 62.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Michigan | W 26-19 | — | 3 | 41 | 7 | 13.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Clemson | L 10-34 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Wofford | W 31-10 | — | 3 | 10 | 2.8 | 3.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Florida | W 28-20 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.7 | 11.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Georgia | L 10-24 | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-27 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.4 | 7.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tennessee | W 15-9 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Arkansas | W 48-22 | — | 2 | 76 | 22 | 38 | 1 | 62 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-24 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 17-16 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Kentucky | L 13-23 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Missouri | W 31-13 | — | 3 | 69 | 17.8 | 23 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs NC State | W 35-28 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
South Carolina
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | South Carolina | 106 | 65.3 | 9 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | South Carolina | 616 | 77.4 | 19 | 510 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Carolina | 616 | 77.4 | 19 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | South Carolina | 559 | 69.2 | 19.1 | -57 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Carolina | 559 | 69.2 | 19.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#3
Kentucky
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · South Carolina
616 primary output · 77.4 efficiency · 19 usage
63.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · South Carolina
63.9
616 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 19 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · South Carolina
60.2
559 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 19.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,281
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.