Player Stats

D.J. Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
952
Receptions
108
Touchdowns
11

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois4-0150.1
2016 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois9991032.9
2017 PostseasonNorthern Illinois13423056.8
2017 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois1338342456.8
2018 PostseasonNorthern Illinois14212068.1
2018 Regular SeasonNorthern Illinois1455484668.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Northern Illinois paired 496 primary output with 49.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 49.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Northern Illinois

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

35.4

Efficiency

49.3

Usage

24.6

Consistency

41.1

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UAB: 12. Iowa: 38. Utah: 23. Central Michigan: 69. Florida State: 117. Eastern Michigan: 3. Ball State: 49. Ohio: 28. BYU: 7. Akron: 14. Toledo: 3. Miami (OH): 19. Western Michigan: 30. Buffalo: 84

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 40. Iowa: 5 by 50.7. Utah: 4 by 38.3. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Florida State: 7 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 4. Ball State: 7 by 46.7. Ohio: 4 by 46.7. BYU: 1 by 46.7. Akron: 3 by 31.1. Toledo: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 5 by 25.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 40. Buffalo: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins32.1 · Games = 8 · -7.7 vs Losses
Losses39.8 · Games = 6 · +7.7 vs Wins