Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Northern Illinois
WR • 5'9" • 185 lbs • North Little Rock, AR, USA
D.J. Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.6
Efficiency
49.3
Consistency
41.1
Season Value
53.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Northern Illinois
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D.J. Brown, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Postseason · Northern Illinois. D.J. Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
D.J. Brown played WR for Northern Illinois. Across 4 tracked seasons, D.J. Brown recorded 5 passing yards, 296 rushing yards, and 952 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Northern Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Northern Illinois paired 496 primary output with 49.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 49.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
35.4
Efficiency
49.3
Usage
24.6
Consistency
41.1
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 12. Iowa: 38. Utah: 23. Central Michigan: 69. Florida State: 117. Eastern Michigan: 3. Ball State: 49. Ohio: 28. BYU: 7. Akron: 14. Toledo: 3. Miami (OH): 19. Western Michigan: 30. Buffalo: 84
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 40. Iowa: 5 by 50.7. Utah: 4 by 38.3. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Florida State: 7 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 4. Ball State: 7 by 46.7. Ohio: 4 by 46.7. BYU: 1 by 46.7. Akron: 3 by 31.1. Toledo: 1 by 20. Miami (OH): 5 by 25.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 40. Buffalo: 4 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/19 | vs UAB | L 13-37 | — | 2 | 12 | 4.3 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Buffalo2+ TD | W 30-29 | — | 4 | 84 | 17.6 | 21 | 2 | 35 |
| Wed 11/21 | @ Western Michigan | L 21-28 | — | 5 | 30 | 5.1 | 6 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 11/15 | vs Miami (OH) | L 7-13 | — | 5 | 19 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/8 | vs Toledo | W 38-15 | — | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Thu 11/1 | @ Akron | W 36-26 | — | 3 | 14 | 5.5 | 4.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ BYU | W 7-6 | — | 1 | 7 | 2.5 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Ohio | W 24-21 | — | 4 | 28 | 9.7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Ball State | W 24-16 | — | 7 | 49 | 7.6 | 7 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 26-23 | — | 5 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.60 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Florida State100 receiving yards | L 19-37 | — | 7 | 117 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 66 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Central Michigan | W 24-16 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Utah | L 6-17 | — | 4 | 23 | 4.6 | 5.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Iowa | L 7-33 | — | 5 | 38 | 4.9 | 7.60 | 0 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northern Illinois
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | — | 0.1 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 91 | 58.7 | 7.1 | 91 |
| 2017 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 365 | 53.2 | 19.2 | 274 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 365 | 53.2 | 19.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 496 | 49.3 | 24.6 | 131 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 496 | 49.3 | 24.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Primary metric
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 99 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Illinois
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 83.8 efficiency score.
#4
Central Michigan
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Postseason · Northern Illinois
496 primary output · 49.3 efficiency · 24.6 usage
53.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
53.7
496 primary · 49.3 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0.1 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
952
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.