Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2015-2016Wake Forest
QB • 6'2" • San Ramon, CA, USA
Kyle Kearns is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
11.1
Efficiency
39.3
Consistency
52.6
Season Value
50.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Kearns, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Wake Forest. Kyle Kearns is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Kyle Kearns played QB for Wake Forest. Across 2 tracked seasons, Kyle Kearns recorded 206 passing yards and -31 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 175 primary output with 39.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 39.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 60 yards of offense and 50 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
43.8
Efficiency
39.3
Usage
11.1
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 60. NC State: 20. Louisville: 0. Clemson: 95
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 10 by 50. NC State: 5 by 57.8. Louisville: 2 by 0. Clemson: 22 by 49.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
57.8 vs NC State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 175 | 39.3 | 11.1 | 175 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 175 | 39.3 | 11.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with 60 yards of offense and 50 efficiency.
60
Primary metric
60 total offense with 50 efficiency.
#2
Clemson
95
Primary metric
Loss with 95 yards of offense and 49.3 efficiency.
95 total offense with 49.3 efficiency.
#3
NC State
20
Primary metric
Loss with 20 yards of offense and 57.8 efficiency.
20 total offense with 57.8 efficiency.
#4
Louisville
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 yards of offense and 0 efficiency.
0 total offense with 0 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Wake Forest
175 primary output · 39.3 efficiency · 11.1 usage
50.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Wake Forest
50.7
175 primary · 39.3 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Wake Forest
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
0
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
175
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.