Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018Wake Forest
Alex Bachman
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Moorpark, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Alex Bachman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.2
Consistency
54
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Wake Forest
15161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Bachman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Wake Forest. Alex Bachman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 541 primary output with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
49.2
Efficiency
79.2
Usage
17.5
Consistency
54
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 171. Tulane: 62. Unknown: 54. Notre Dame: 12. Clemson: 6. Florida State: 32. Louisville: 22. Syracuse: 47. NC State: 59. Pittsburgh: 60. Duke: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 7 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 82.7. Unknown: 4 by 90. Notre Dame: 1 by 80. Clemson: 1 by 40. Florida State: 3 by 71.1. Louisville: 2 by 73.3. Syracuse: 3 by 100. NC State: 4 by 98.3. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. Duke: 3 by 35.6
Split Comparison
Wins66 · n=5 · +34.6 vs Losses
Losses31.4 · n=5 · -34.6 vs Wins
First Half56.2 · n=6 · +15.4 vs Second Half
Second Half40.8 · n=5 · -15.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/22 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards | W 37-34 | — | 7 | 171 | 24.4 | 24.40 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Duke | W 59-7 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Pittsburgh | L 13-34 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 28 |
| Fri 11/9 | @ NC State | W 27-23 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Syracuse | L 24-41 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Louisville | W 56-35 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Florida State | L 17-38 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Clemson | L 3-63 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Notre Dame | L 27-56 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ Tulane2+ TD | W 23-17 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 2 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 8 | 53.3 | 3.4 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 248 | 58.5 | 14.4 | 240 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 248 | 58.5 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wake Forest | 365 | 78.6 | 12.3 | 117 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 365 | 78.6 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 541 | 79.2 | 17.5 | 176 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 541 | 79.2 | 17.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Duke
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Wake Forest
541 primary output · 79.2 efficiency · 17.5 usage
62.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Wake Forest
62.7
541 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Wake Forest
56.5
365 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 12.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8061
Oaks Christian · Thousand Oaks, CA
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,162
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.