Usage Score
17.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018Wake Forest
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Moorpark, CA, USA
Alex Bachman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.5
Efficiency
79.2
Consistency
54
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alex Bachman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Wake Forest. Alex Bachman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Alex Bachman played WR for Wake Forest. Across 4 tracked seasons, Alex Bachman recorded 1,162 receiving yards, 8 tackles, and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 541 primary output with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
49.2
Efficiency
79.2
Usage
17.5
Consistency
54
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 171. Tulane: 62. Unknown: 54. Notre Dame: 12. Clemson: 6. Florida State: 32. Louisville: 22. Syracuse: 47. NC State: 59. Pittsburgh: 60. Duke: 16
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Memphis: 7 by 100. Tulane: 5 by 82.7. Unknown: 4 by 90. Notre Dame: 1 by 80. Clemson: 1 by 40. Florida State: 3 by 71.1. Louisville: 2 by 73.3. Syracuse: 3 by 100. NC State: 4 by 98.3. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. Duke: 3 by 35.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/22 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards | W 37-34 | — | 7 | 171 | 24.4 | 24.40 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Duke | W 59-7 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Pittsburgh | L 13-34 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 28 |
| Fri 11/9 | @ NC State | W 27-23 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Syracuse | L 24-41 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Louisville | W 56-35 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Florida State | L 17-38 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Clemson | L 3-63 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Notre Dame | L 27-56 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ Tulane2+ TD | W 23-17 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 2 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 8 | 53.3 | 3.4 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 248 | 58.5 | 14.4 | 240 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 248 | 58.5 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Wake Forest | 365 | 78.6 | 12.3 | 117 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 365 | 78.6 | 12.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Wake Forest | 541 | 79.2 | 17.5 | 176 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 541 | 79.2 | 17.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Duke
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Duke
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Wake Forest
541 primary output · 79.2 efficiency · 17.5 usage
62.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Wake Forest
62.7
541 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Wake Forest
56.5
365 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 12.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8061
Oaks Christian · Thousand Oaks, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,162
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.