Usage Score
22.9
Player Dossier
2015-2016Purdue
WR • 6'3" • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Domonique Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.9
Efficiency
70.9
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Domonique Young, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. Domonique Young reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Domonique Young played WR for Purdue. Across 2 tracked seasons, Domonique Young recorded 4 rushing yards, 614 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 338 primary output with 70.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
67.6
Efficiency
70.9
Usage
22.9
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Kentucky: 74. Cincinnati: 136. Nevada: 22. Maryland: 47. Illinois: 59
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Kentucky: 8 by 61.7. Cincinnati: 8 by 100. Nevada: 3 by 48.9. Maryland: 4 by 78.3. Illinois: 6 by 65.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
100 vs Cincinnati
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Purdue | 276 | 73.4 | 11.3 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 338 | 70.9 | 22.9 | 62 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northwestern
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Kentucky
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 61.7 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 76 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
338 primary output · 70.9 efficiency · 22.9 usage
64.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Purdue
49.4
276 primary · 73.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
614
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.