Usage Score
26.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018Duke
WR • 5'10" • 170 lbs • Powder Springs, GA, USA
T.J. Rahming reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.5
Efficiency
65.4
Consistency
36
Season Value
57
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Duke
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Rahming, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Duke. T.J. Rahming reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
T.J. Rahming played WR for Duke. Across 4 tracked seasons, T.J. Rahming recorded 22 passing yards, 85 rushing yards, and 2,916 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Duke.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Duke paired 739 primary output with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
62.4
Efficiency
65.4
Usage
26.5
Consistency
36
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 240. Army: 44. Northwestern: 32. Baylor: 55. North Carolina Central: 27. Virginia Tech: 30. Georgia Tech: 91. Virginia: 37. Pittsburgh: 78. Miami: 26. North Carolina: 98. Clemson: 38. Wake Forest: 15
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 12 by 100. Army: 5 by 58.7. Northwestern: 4 by 53.3. Baylor: 4 by 91.7. North Carolina Central: 4 by 45. Virginia Tech: 3 by 66.7. Georgia Tech: 4 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 41.1. Pittsburgh: 9 by 57.8. Miami: 5 by 34.7. North Carolina: 9 by 72.6. Clemson: 9 by 28.1. Wake Forest: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Temple100 receiving yards · High volume | W 56-27 | — | 12 | 240 | 18.4 | 20 | 2 | 85 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Wake Forest | L 7-59 | — | 1 | 15 | 6.3 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ ClemsonHigh volume | L 6-35 | — | 9 | 38 | 4.2 | 4.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs North CarolinaHigh volume | W 42-35 | — | 9 | 98 | 9.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Miami | W 20-12 | — | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 5.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ PittsburghHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 45-54 | — | 9 | 78 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Virginia | L 14-28 | — | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Georgia Tech | W 28-14 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Virginia Tech | L 14-31 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs North Carolina Central | W 55-13 | — | 4 | 27 | 13 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Baylor2+ TD | W 40-27 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | — | 4 | 32 | 6.4 | 8 | 1 | 18 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Army | W 34-14 | — | 5 | 44 | 10 | 8.80 | 0 | 35 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Duke
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Duke | 571 | 73.5 | 18 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Duke | 571 | 73.5 | 18 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Duke | 739 | 72.1 | 27.7 | 168 |
| 2017 Postseason | Duke | 795 | 76.3 | 24.7 | 56 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Duke | 795 | 76.3 | 24.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Duke | 811 | 65.4 | 26.5 | 16 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Duke | 811 | 65.4 | 26.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
142
Primary metric
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia
190
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
190 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
240
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
240 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 78 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Duke
739 primary output · 72.1 efficiency · 27.7 usage
66.7
#2
2017 Postseason · Duke
61.6
795 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 24.7 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Duke
61.6
795 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 24.7 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
15
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,916
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.