Usage Score
11.3
Player Dossier
2015-2016Illinois
WR • 5'11" • Delray Beach, FL, USA
Desmond Cain reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.3
Efficiency
67.8
Consistency
63
Season Value
38.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Illinois
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Desmond Cain, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Illinois. Desmond Cain reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Desmond Cain played WR for Illinois. Across 2 tracked seasons, Desmond Cain recorded 5 rushing yards, 553 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Illinois paired 492 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Murray State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
20.3
Efficiency
67.8
Usage
11.3
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Murray State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Murray State: 37. North Carolina: 7. Michigan State: 17
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Murray State: 2 by 100. North Carolina: 1 by 46.7. Michigan State: 2 by 56.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Murray State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Murray State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Illinois
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Illinois | 492 | 65.9 | 18 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Illinois | 61 | 67.8 | 11.3 | -431 |
#1 Featured game
Murray State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37
Primary metric
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio State
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 68 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 77.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Regular Season · Illinois
492 primary output · 65.9 efficiency · 18 usage
62.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Illinois
38.6
61 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 11.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
553
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.