Usage / Role
14%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2015-2018Texas A&M
RB • 5'9" • 200 lbs • Conroe, TX, USA
Kwame Etwi leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.8 efficiency.
Usage / Role
14%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
11
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
17
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Kwame Etwi, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Kwame Etwi leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.8 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 6 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 45.1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | 142 | 142 | 0 | 0 | 45.1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 3 | 63 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 50 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 3 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 38.6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 3 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 38.6 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 6 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 48.9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | 126 | 110 | 16 | 1 | 48.9 |
Related Context
Kwame Etwi played RB for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kwame Etwi recorded 391 rushing yards, 23 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 63 primary output with 70 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern State
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
24.2
Efficiency
58.8
Usage
5.8
Consistency
24.2
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 19. Northwestern State: 83. Clemson: 8. UL Monroe: 11. Alabama: 16. UAB: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 3 by 66. Northwestern State: 8 by 93.2. Clemson: 3 by 27.8. UL Monroe: 3 by 38.2. Alabama: 1 by 100. UAB: 3 by 27.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 151 | 52.4 | 4.9 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 151 | 52.4 | 4.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 63 | 70 | 5.4 | -88 |
| 2017 Postseason | Texas A&M | 55 | 55.3 | 5.7 | -8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 55 | 55.3 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Texas A&M | 145 | 58.8 | 5.8 | 90 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 145 | 58.8 | 5.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Ball State
Week 2 · W 56-23
Win with 116 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
116
Scrimmage Yards
79.7 takeover
116 scrimmage yards and 17.1 usage.
#2
vs Northwestern State
Week 1 · W 59-7
83
Scrimmage Yards
73.4 takeover
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 9.5 usage.
#3
vs Prairie View A&M
Week 2 · W 67-0
32
Scrimmage Yards
62.9 takeover
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 7.7 usage.
#4
vs Louisiana
Week 3 · W 45-21
35
Scrimmage Yards
62.9 takeover
Win with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 9.8 usage.
#5
vs New Mexico State
Week 9 · W 52-10
23
Scrimmage Yards
50.2 takeover
Win with 23 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
23 scrimmage yards and 6.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
63 primary output · 70 efficiency · 5.4 usage
50
#2
2018 Postseason · Texas A&M
48.9
145 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 5.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
48.9
145 primary · 58.8 efficiency · 5.8 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.