Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2015-2018Army
RB • 5'9" • 195 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Jordan Asberry leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 67.2 efficiency.
Usage Score
6.4
Efficiency
67.2
Consistency
68.3
Season Value
57.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Asberry, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Army. Jordan Asberry leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 67.2 efficiency.
Jordan Asberry played RB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jordan Asberry recorded 947 rushing yards, 437 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Army paired 502 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
39.6
Efficiency
67.2
Usage
6.4
Consistency
68.3
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 85. Duke: 22. Oklahoma: 36. Buffalo: 33. San José State: 55. Miami (OH): 14. Eastern Michigan: 72. Air Force: 38. Lafayette: 47. Colgate: 33. Navy: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 7 by 100. Duke: 2 by 91.7. Oklahoma: 5 by 75. Buffalo: 5 by 40. San José State: 3 by 93.8. Miami (OH): 3 by 48.6. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 46.7. Air Force: 4 by 49. Lafayette: 5 by 89.2. Colgate: 2 by 100. Navy: 2 by 5.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/22 | vs Houston | W 70-14 | 5 | 63 | 12.60 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 12.1 |
| Sat 12/8 | vs Navy | W 17-10 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | — | — | 0.5 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Colgate | W 28-14 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 16.5 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Lafayette | W 31-13 | 5 | 47 | 9.40 | 0 | — | — | 9.4 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Air Force | W 17-14 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 2 | 35 | 9.5 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Eastern Michigan2+ TD | W 37-22 | 7 | 15 | 2.10 | 1 | 2 | 57 | 8 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Miami (OH) | W 31-30 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ San José State | W 52-3 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 41 | 18.3 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Buffalo | W 42-13 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 6.6 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Oklahoma | L 21-28 | 5 | 36 | 7.20 | 0 | — | — | 7.2 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ Duke | L 14-34 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 22 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 253 | 58.4 | 7.5 | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 502 | 68 | 7 | 249 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 502 | 68 | 7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 193 | 66.3 | 3.5 | -309 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 193 | 66.3 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Army | 436 | 67.2 | 6.4 | 243 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 436 | 67.2 | 6.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Fordham
Loss with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89
Primary metric
89 scrimmage yards and 12.5 usage.
#2
Houston
85
Primary metric
Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 11.3 usage.
#3
Lafayette
107
Primary metric
Win with 107 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
107 scrimmage yards and 6.6 usage.
#4
UTEP
66
Primary metric
Win with 66 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
66 scrimmage yards and 9.4 usage.
#5
Bucknell
63
Primary metric
Win with 63 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
63 scrimmage yards and 7.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Army
502 primary output · 68 efficiency · 7 usage
59.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Army
59.3
502 primary · 68 efficiency · 7 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Army
57.2
436 primary · 67.2 efficiency · 6.4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,384
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.