Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2015-2019Buffalo
Matt Seybert
TE • 6'4" • 252 lbs • Traverse City, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Matt Seybert reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68
Consistency
75.3
Season Value
63.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
1516171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo • Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Seybert, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan State. Matt Seybert reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 284 primary output with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
28.4
Efficiency
68
Usage
13.5
Consistency
75.3
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 12. Arizona State: 50. Northwestern: 28. Indiana: 43. Ohio State: 37. Wisconsin: 15. Penn State: 10. Illinois: 27. Michigan: 32. Maryland: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 2 by 40. Arizona State: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 46.7. Indiana: 3 by 95.6. Ohio State: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 50. Penn State: 1 by 66.7. Illinois: 3 by 60. Michigan: 3 by 71.1. Maryland: 4 by 50
Split Comparison
Wins28.3 · n=4 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses28.5 · n=6 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half34 · n=5 · +11.2 vs Second Half
Second Half22.8 · n=5 · -11.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Maryland | W 19-16 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Michigan | L 10-44 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Illinois | L 34-37 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Penn State | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-38 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Ohio State | L 10-34 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Indiana | W 40-31 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Northwestern2+ TD | W 31-10 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arizona State | L 7-10 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 48 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Tulsa | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2015
Opening stop
- 2
Michigan State
2016-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
20152016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 284 | 68 | 13.5 | 284 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50
Primary metric
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio State
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
284 primary output · 68 efficiency · 13.5 usage
63.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7917
St. Francis · Traverse City, MI
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
284
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.