Player Stats

Tyler Mabry College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
722
Receptions
73
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonBuffalo0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonBuffalo9995040.7
2017 Regular SeasonBuffalo1124242160.7
2018 PostseasonBuffalo11217063.8
2018 Regular SeasonBuffalo1125213263.8
2019 Regular SeasonMaryland913155354.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Buffalo paired 230 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 64.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, Maryland.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Maryland

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

17.2

Efficiency

64.2

Usage

11.4

Consistency

51.3

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Howard: 24. Syracuse: 22. Temple: 17. Penn State: 14. Rutgers: 13. Indiana: 52. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 7. Nebraska: 6

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Howard: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 1 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 46.7. Rutgers: 2 by 43.3. Indiana: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 1 by 46.7. Nebraska: 1 by 40

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins19.7 · Games = 3 · +3.7 vs Losses
Losses16 · Games = 6 · -3.7 vs Wins