Usage Score
11.4
Player Dossier
2015-2019Maryland
Tyler Mabry
TE • 6'4" • 248 lbs • Ypsilanti, MI, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tyler Mabry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.2
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
47.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Buffalo
151617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Buffalo • Maryland
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Mabry, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Buffalo. Tyler Mabry reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyler Mabry played TE for Buffalo and Maryland. Across 5 tracked seasons, Tyler Mabry recorded 722 receiving yards, 7 tackles, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Buffalo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Buffalo paired 230 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Buffalo, Maryland.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Maryland
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
17.2
Efficiency
64.2
Usage
11.4
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Nebraska
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 24. Syracuse: 22. Temple: 17. Penn State: 14. Rutgers: 13. Indiana: 52. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 7. Nebraska: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 36.7. Temple: 1 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 46.7. Rutgers: 2 by 43.3. Indiana: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 1 by 46.7. Nebraska: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins17.5 · Games = 2 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses16 · Games = 6 · -1.5 vs Wins
First Half18 · Games = 5 · +1.8 vs Second Half
Second Half16.3 · Games = 4 · -1.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Indiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | vs Nebraska | L 7-54 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Ohio State | L 14-73 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Michigan | L 7-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Indiana | L 28-34 | — | 1 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Rutgers | W 48-7 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Penn State | L 0-59 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Temple | L 17-20 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Syracuse | W 63-20 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Maryland
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
201520162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 95 | 58.6 | 9.5 | 95 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 242 | 56.2 | 11.2 | 147 |
| 2018 Postseason | Buffalo | 230 | 56.5 | 14.3 | -12 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 230 | 56.5 | 14.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Maryland | 155 | 64.2 | 11.4 | -75 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29
Primary metric
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
58
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
28
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Buffalo
230 primary output · 56.5 efficiency · 14.3 usage
55.2
#2
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
55.2
230 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
53.8
242 primary · 56.2 efficiency · 11.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7793
IMG Academy · Bradenton, FL
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
722
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.