Usage Score
3.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Buffalo
Cameron Lewis
CB • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cameron Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Efficiency
19
Consistency
54.6
Season Value
23.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cameron Lewis, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Buffalo. Cameron Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 19 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 19 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
19
Usage
3.9
Consistency
54.6
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1.5. Temple: 2. Eastern Michigan: 0. Rutgers: 1. Central Michigan: 1. Akron: 2. Toledo: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Kent State: 1. Ohio: 1. Bowling Green: 0. Northern Illinois: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 23.3. Temple: 4 by 36.7. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Rutgers: 1 by 14.2. Central Michigan: 2 by 18.3. Akron: 2 by 28.3. Toledo: 2 by 8.3. Miami (OH): 2 by 8.3. Kent State: 1 by 14.2. Ohio: 7 by 39.2. Bowling Green: 1 by 4.2. Northern Illinois: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.8 · Games = 9 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 2 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 6 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
39.2 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | vs Northern Illinois | L 29-30 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Bowling Green | W 44-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Ohio | L 17-52 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Wed 11/7 | vs Kent State | W 48-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Miami (OH) | W 51-42 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Toledo | W 31-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Akron | W 24-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Central Michigan | W 34-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Rutgers | W 42-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 35-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ TempleSplash game | W 36-29 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 9.5 | 28.8 | 4.3 | 8.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 6 | 29.4 | 7.6 | -3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 9.5 | 19 | 3.9 | 3.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Minnesota
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#3
Temple
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.9 takeover score.
#4
Akron
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#5
Ball State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Buffalo
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Buffalo
23.3
9.5 primary · 19 efficiency · 3.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
21.6
9.5 primary · 28.8 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8053
Voyageur College Prep · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
127
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.