Usage Score
21.9
Player Profile
Mike Weber
RB • 5'10" • 214 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Mike Weber leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
55.9
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
59.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State
15161617171818
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Ohio State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Mike Weber, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State. Mike Weber leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.9 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio State paired 1,187 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
82
Efficiency
55.9
Usage
21.9
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 104. Oregon State: 189. Rutgers: 31. TCU: 92. Tulane: 28. Penn State: 56. Indiana: 75. Minnesota: 53. Purdue: 67. Nebraska: 100. Michigan State: 102. Michigan: 97. Northwestern: 72
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 16 by 67.1. Oregon State: 21 by 87.5. Rutgers: 8 by 40.4. TCU: 22 by 39.6. Tulane: 7 by 35.4. Penn State: 10 by 58.8. Indiana: 14 by 56. Minnesota: 14 by 40.3. Purdue: 14 by 51.2. Nebraska: 10 by 91.7. Michigan State: 22 by 50.3. Michigan: 14 by 75. Northwestern: 20 by 33.8
Split Comparison
Wins83.3 · n=12
First Half82.1 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half81.8 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games82 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Washington | W 28-23 | 15 | 96 | 6.40 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6.5 |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Northwestern | W 45-24 | 17 | 51 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan | W 62-39 | 13 | 96 | 7.40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6.9 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Michigan State100 rush yards | W 26-6 | 21 | 104 | 5 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Nebraska | W 36-31 | 9 | 91 | 10.10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Purdue | L 20-49 | 9 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Minnesota | W 30-14 | 13 | 51 | 3.90 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Indiana | W 49-26 | 13 | 70 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Penn State | W 27-26 | 9 | 51 | 5.70 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.6 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Tulane | W 49-6 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ TCU | W 40-28 | 18 | 64 | 3.60 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Rutgers | W 52-3 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Oregon State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 77-31 | 20 | 186 | 9.30 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 1,187 | 60.5 | 24.5 | 1,187 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1,187 | 60.5 | 24.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 720 | 55 | 14.7 | -467 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 720 | 55 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 1,066 | 55.9 | 21.9 | 346 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1,066 | 55.9 | 21.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with 162 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
162
Primary metric
162 scrimmage yards and 15.8 usage.
#2
Oregon State
189
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
189 scrimmage yards and 26.9 usage.
#3
Rutgers
147
Primary metric
Win with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 19.2 usage.
#4
Bowling Green
136
Primary metric
Win with 136 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
136 scrimmage yards and 23.2 usage.
#5
Oklahoma
129
Primary metric
Win with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
129 scrimmage yards and 30.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
1,187 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 24.5 usage
65.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
65.9
1,187 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 24.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
59.9
1,066 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 21.9 usage
Milestones
13
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9627
Cass Technical · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,973
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.