Usage Score
21.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Ohio State
RB • 5'10" • 214 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
Mike Weber leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.9 efficiency.
Usage Score
21.9
Efficiency
55.9
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
59.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Weber, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State. Mike Weber leans balanced backfield option traits and 55.9 efficiency.
Mike Weber played RB for Ohio State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Mike Weber recorded 2,676 rushing yards, 297 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Ohio State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio State paired 1,187 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
82
Efficiency
55.9
Usage
21.9
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 104. Oregon State: 189. Rutgers: 31. TCU: 92. Tulane: 28. Penn State: 56. Indiana: 75. Minnesota: 53. Purdue: 67. Nebraska: 100. Michigan State: 102. Michigan: 97. Northwestern: 72
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 16 by 67.1. Oregon State: 21 by 87.5. Rutgers: 8 by 40.4. TCU: 22 by 39.6. Tulane: 7 by 35.4. Penn State: 10 by 58.8. Indiana: 14 by 56. Minnesota: 14 by 40.3. Purdue: 14 by 51.2. Nebraska: 10 by 91.7. Michigan State: 22 by 50.3. Michigan: 14 by 75. Northwestern: 20 by 33.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
91.7 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Washington | W 28-23 | 15 | 96 | 6.40 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6.5 |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Northwestern | W 45-24 | 17 | 51 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan | W 62-39 | 13 | 96 | 7.40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6.9 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Michigan State100 rush yards | W 26-6 | 21 | 104 | 5 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 4.6 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Nebraska | W 36-31 | 9 | 91 | 10.10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Purdue | L 20-49 | 9 | 45 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Minnesota | W 30-14 | 13 | 51 | 3.90 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Indiana | W 49-26 | 13 | 70 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Penn State | W 27-26 | 9 | 51 | 5.70 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.6 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Tulane | W 49-6 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ TCU | W 40-28 | 18 | 64 | 3.60 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Rutgers | W 52-3 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Oregon State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 77-31 | 20 | 186 | 9.30 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 1,187 | 60.5 | 24.5 | 1,187 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1,187 | 60.5 | 24.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 720 | 55 | 14.7 | -467 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 720 | 55 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 1,066 | 55.9 | 21.9 | 346 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1,066 | 55.9 | 21.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with 162 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
162
Primary metric
162 scrimmage yards and 15.8 usage.
#2
Oregon State
189
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
189 scrimmage yards and 26.9 usage.
#3
Rutgers
147
Primary metric
Win with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 19.2 usage.
#4
Bowling Green
136
Primary metric
Win with 136 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
136 scrimmage yards and 23.2 usage.
#5
Oklahoma
129
Primary metric
Win with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
129 scrimmage yards and 30.6 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
1,187 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 24.5 usage
65.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
65.9
1,187 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 24.5 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
59.9
1,066 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 21.9 usage
13
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9627
Cass Technical · Detroit, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,973
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.