Usage Score
2.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019Clemson
Denzel Johnson
S • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Columbia, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Denzel Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 10.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
10.1
Consistency
4.8
Season Value
6.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Clemson
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Denzel Johnson, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Clemson. Denzel Johnson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 10.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Clemson paired 0 primary output with 6.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 10.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Clemson
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
10.1
Usage
2.1
Consistency
4.8
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Ohio State: 0. Georgia Tech: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Syracuse: 0. Charlotte: 0. North Carolina: 0. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 0. Boston College: 0. NC State: 0. Wake Forest: 1.5. South Carolina: 0. Virginia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 4 by 16.7. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 5 by 30.8. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. Charlotte: 3 by 12.5. North Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Florida State: 2 by 8.3. Louisville: 1 by 4.2. Boston College: 1 by 4.2. NC State: 1 by 4.2. Wake Forest: 1 by 19.2. South Carolina: 3 by 12.5. Virginia: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.2 · n=13
First Half0.1 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=7 · +0.1 vs First Half
All Games0.2 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wake Forest
Best efficiency game
30.8 vs Georgia Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/14 | @ LSU | L 25-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/29 | @ Ohio State | W 29-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/8 | vs Virginia | W 62-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ South Carolina | W 38-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wake Forest | W 52-3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | @ NC State | W 55-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Boston College | W 59-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisville | W 45-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Florida State | W 45-14 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ North Carolina | W 21-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Charlotte | W 52-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Syracuse | W 41-6 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Texas A&M | W 24-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Georgia Tech | W 52-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | 6.7 | 1.1 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 2 | 12.3 | 2.6 | 2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 2 | 12.3 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 4.5 | 14.9 | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 4.5 | 14.9 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Clemson | 2.5 | 10.1 | 2.1 | -2 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 2.5 | 10.1 | 2.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#2
NC State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.2 takeover score.
#3
Duke
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.7 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#5
Wake Forest
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Clemson
0 primary output · 6.7 efficiency · 1.1 usage
35.9
#2
2017 Postseason · Clemson
18.2
2 primary · 12.3 efficiency · 2.6 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Clemson
18.2
2 primary · 12.3 efficiency · 2.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8333
A.C. Flora · Columbia, SC
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
68
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.