Usage Score
4.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Middle Tennessee
WR • 5'10" • 178 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA
Jocquez Bruce reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.2
Efficiency
30
Consistency
64.8
Season Value
25.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jocquez Bruce, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Jocquez Bruce reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 31 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 30 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
4.5
Efficiency
30
Usage
4.2
Consistency
64.8
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 7. Unknown: 2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Michigan
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 31 | 100 | 6.7 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 59 | 50 | 8.1 | 28 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 89 | 58.3 | 7 | 30 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 9 | 30 | 4.2 | -80 |
#1 Featured game
Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Hawai'i
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
31 primary output · 100 efficiency · 6.7 usage
54.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
37.3
89 primary · 58.3 efficiency · 7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
25.6
9 primary · 30 efficiency · 4.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9441
Dripping Springs · Dripping Springs, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
188
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jocquez Bruce quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit