Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2015-2017UTSA
LB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • St. Louis, MO, USA
La'Kel Bass shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
36.2
Consistency
55
Season Value
39.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
La'Kel Bass, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · UTSA. La'Kel Bass shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.2 disruption score.
La'Kel Bass played LB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, La'Kel Bass recorded 155 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
UTSA paired 20 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 36.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
36.2
Usage
10.2
Consistency
55
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 2. Southern: 1. Texas State: 2. Southern Miss: 2.5. North Texas: 0. Rice: 0.5. UTEP: 0.5. Florida International: 1. UAB: 2. Marshall: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 3 by 32.5. Southern: 5 by 30.8. Texas State: 4 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 9 by 62.5. North Texas: 6 by 25. Rice: 8 by 38.3. UTEP: 5 by 25.8. Florida International: 8 by 43.3. UAB: 11 by 65.8. Marshall: 7 by 29.2. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 6-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Marshall | W 9-7 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs UAB10+ tackles · Splash game | L 19-24 | 11 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Florida International | L 7-14 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Rice | W 20-7 | 8 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 26-29 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Southern MissSplash game | L 29-31 | 9 | 3 | — | 2 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas StateSplash game | W 44-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Southern | W 51-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ BaylorSplash game | W 17-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | UTSA | 20 | 43.3 | 11.6 | 20 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 20 | 43.3 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 11.5 | 36.2 | 10.2 | -8.5 |
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 71.2 takeover score.
#2
Southern Miss
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#3
UAB
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.2 takeover score.
#4
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#5
Texas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 42.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · UTSA
20 primary output · 43.3 efficiency · 11.6 usage
52.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
52.3
20 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
39.7
11.5 primary · 36.2 efficiency · 10.2 usage
2
Impact games
10
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
155
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.