Usage Score
21.8
Player Dossier
2015-2017UTSA
Josh Stewart
WR • 6'4" • 210 lbs • College Station, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Josh Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.6
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTSA
151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTSA. Josh Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Josh Stewart played WR for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Josh Stewart recorded 1,194 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTSA paired 682 primary output with 88.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.5
Efficiency
80.6
Usage
21.8
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 54. Southern: 16. Texas State: 15. Southern Miss: 101. North Texas: 54. Rice: 66. UTEP: 46. Florida International: 29. UAB: 40. Marshall: 69. Louisiana Tech: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 5 by 72. Southern: 2 by 53.3. Texas State: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. North Texas: 3 by 100. Rice: 5 by 88. UTEP: 4 by 76.7. Florida International: 3 by 64.4. UAB: 4 by 66.7. Marshall: 5 by 92. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins44.3 · Games = 6 · -4.9 vs Losses
Losses49.2 · Games = 5 · +4.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 6-20 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/19 | vs Marshall | W 9-7 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs UAB | L 19-24 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Florida International | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/29 | @ UTEP | W 31-14 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Rice | W 20-7 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 26-29 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Southern Miss100 receiving yards | L 29-31 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Texas State | W 44-14 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Southern | W 51-17 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 9/10 | @ Baylor | W 17-10 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 682 | 88.9 | 20.4 | 682 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 512 | 80.6 | 21.8 | -170 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
101
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
North Texas
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
682 primary output · 88.9 efficiency · 20.4 usage
69
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
61.8
512 primary · 80.6 efficiency · 21.8 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,194
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Josh Stewart
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.