Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTSA
S • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Austin, TX, USA
Carl Austin III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.1
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
40.2
Season Value
44.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carl Austin III, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA. Carl Austin III shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Carl Austin III played S for UTSA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Carl Austin III recorded 124 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTSA paired 8.5 primary output with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
7.1
Consistency
40.2
Best Game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Incarnate Word: 0. Baylor: 0. Army: 0. North Texas: 1.5. UTEP: 0. UAB: 1.5. Rice: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Old Dominion: 2.5. Southern Miss: 1. Florida Atlantic: 1. Louisiana Tech: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Incarnate Word: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 6 by 25. Army: 5 by 20.8. North Texas: 6 by 40. UTEP: 9 by 37.5. UAB: 7 by 44.2. Rice: 6 by 25. Texas A&M: 6 by 25. Old Dominion: 5 by 45.8. Southern Miss: 7 by 39.2. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 30.8. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 22.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Old Dominion
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 27-41 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 26-40 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Southern Miss | L 17-36 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Old DominionSplash game | W 24-23 | 5 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Texas A&M | L 14-45 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Rice | W 31-27 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | L 14-33 | 7 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | @ UTEP | W 26-16 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ North Texas | L 3-45 | 6 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Army | L 13-31 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Baylor | L 14-63 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Incarnate Word | W 35-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 2.5 | 13.4 | 2.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 7.5 | 24.6 | 6.2 | 5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | -7.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 8.5 | 30.3 | 7.1 | 8.5 |
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.4 takeover score.
#2
Old Dominion
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.2 takeover score.
#4
Charlotte
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.2 takeover score.
#5
UAB
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 39.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
8.5 primary output · 30.3 efficiency · 7.1 usage
44.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
33.6
7.5 primary · 24.6 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTSA
14.7
2.5 primary · 13.4 efficiency · 2.8 usage
0
Impact games
3
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
124
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.