Usage Score
7.3
Player Dossier
2015-2016North Texas
LB • 5'11" • Bay City, TX, USA
Cortney Finney shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.3
Efficiency
32.3
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
38.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cortney Finney, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · North Texas. Cortney Finney shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Cortney Finney played LB for North Texas. Across 2 tracked seasons, Cortney Finney recorded 78 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with North Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
North Texas paired 9.5 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bethune-Cookman
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
32.3
Usage
7.3
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Bethune-Cookman
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. SMU: 0. Bethune-Cookman: 5. Florida: 0. Rice: 0. Middle Tennessee: 1.5. Marshall: 1. Army: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Southern Miss: 1. UTEP: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 8 by 33.3. SMU: 3 by 12.5. Bethune-Cookman: 8 by 83.3. Florida: 5 by 20.8. Rice: 12 by 50. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 40. Marshall: 7 by 39.2. Army: 5 by 20.8. UTSA: 6 by 25. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 29.2. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 35. UTEP: 4 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Bethune-Cookman
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Bethune-Cookman
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Army | L 31-38 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTEP | L 24-52 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Southern Miss | W 29-23 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 24-45 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UTSA | L 17-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Army | W 35-18 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Marshall | W 38-21 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-30 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Rice10+ tackles | W 42-35 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Florida | L 0-32 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Bethune-CookmanSplash game | W 41-20 | 8 | 7 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs SMU | L 21-34 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 9.5 | 32.3 | 7.3 | 9.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 9.5 | 32.3 | 7.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Bethune-Cookman
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 70.4 takeover score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 27.9 takeover score.
#3
Marshall
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 21.8 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 20.8 takeover score.
#5
Rice
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 18.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · North Texas
9.5 primary output · 32.3 efficiency · 7.3 usage
38.1
#2
2016 Regular Season · North Texas
38.1
9.5 primary · 32.3 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · North Texas
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
78
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.