Usage Score
2.6
Player Dossier
2015-2019Middle Tennessee
Desmond Anderson
CB • 5'10" • 176 lbs • Pacolet, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Desmond Anderson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
17.8
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
6.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
15161617171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Desmond Anderson, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Desmond Anderson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 17.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
17.8
Usage
2.6
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 0. Unknown: 0. Duke: 0. Iowa: 0. Marshall: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. North Texas: 0. Florida International: 1. Charlotte: 1. Rice: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 7 by 29.2. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Duke: 3 by 12.5. Iowa: 4 by 16.7. Marshall: 4 by 16.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 7 by 29.2. Florida International: 2 by 18.3. Charlotte: 5 by 30.8. Rice: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=2 · +0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.1 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Wins
First Half0 · n=5 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=5 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
30.8 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/16 | vs Rice | L 28-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Charlotte | L 20-34 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Florida International | W 50-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ North Texas | L 30-33 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 13-28 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Marshall | W 24-13 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Iowa | L 3-48 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Duke | L 18-41 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Michigan | L 21-40 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 2 | 17.8 | 2.6 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.6 takeover score.
#2
Florida International
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.1 takeover score.
#3
North Texas
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 11.3 takeover score.
#4
Michigan
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 11.2 takeover score.
#5
Marshall
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2018 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
34.9
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
33.7
0 primary · 0.9 efficiency · 0.1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7433
Broome · Spartanburg, SC
- Committed To
- Middle Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
42
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.