Usage Score
32.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018Bowling Green
Scott Miller
WR • 5'10" • 160 lbs • Barrington, IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Scott Miller reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.2
Consistency
55.7
Season Value
66.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1515161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Scott Miller, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Scott Miller reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 1,106 primary output with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
100.5
Efficiency
82.2
Usage
32.5
Consistency
55.7
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 166. Maryland: 11. Miami (OH): 65. Georgia Tech: 117. Toledo: 75. Western Michigan: 206. Ohio: 145. Kent State: 75. Central Michigan: 73. Akron: 58. Buffalo: 115
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 13 by 85.1. Maryland: 3 by 24.4. Miami (OH): 5 by 86.7. Georgia Tech: 10 by 78. Toledo: 3 by 100. Western Michigan: 8 by 100. Ohio: 6 by 100. Kent State: 6 by 83.3. Central Michigan: 7 by 69.5. Akron: 5 by 77.3. Buffalo: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins65.5 · n=2 · -42.8 vs Losses
Losses108.3 · n=9 · +42.8 vs Wins
First Half106.7 · n=6 · +13.5 vs Second Half
Second Half93.2 · n=5 · -13.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 14-44 | — | 4 | 115 | 28.8 | 28.80 | 2 | 63 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Akron | W 21-6 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Central Michigan | W 24-13 | — | 7 | 73 | 7.7 | 10.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Kent State | L 28-35 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ohio100 receiving yards | L 14-49 | — | 6 | 145 | 22.4 | 24.20 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-42 | — | 8 | 206 | 25.8 | 25.80 | 2 | 76 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Toledo | L 36-52 | — | 3 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-63 | — | 10 | 117 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Miami (OH) | L 23-38 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Maryland | L 14-45 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Oregon100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-58 | — | 13 | 166 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 2 | 63 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Bowling Green | 29 | 25.3 | 6.5 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 29 | 25.3 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 968 | 69.3 | 30 | 939 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 722 | 76.4 | 26.5 | -246 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,106 | 82.2 | 32.5 | 384 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178
Primary metric
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
206
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
206 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
166
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
166 receiving yards with a 85.1 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
148
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 89.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1,106 primary output · 82.2 efficiency · 32.5 usage
66.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
58
722 primary · 76.4 efficiency · 26.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Bowling Green
57
968 primary · 69.3 efficiency · 30 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.7956
Barrington · Barrington, IL
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,825
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.