Usage / Role
67%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2015-2016Texas A&M
DB • 6'1" • Wiggins, MS, USA
Justin Evans shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.9 disruption score.
Usage / Role
67%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
74
High-end production for a defensive back
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
62
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Player Story
Justin Evans built his college career from 2015 through 2016 as a defensive back from Wiggins, MS wearing No. 14, spending time with Texas A&M. The clearest part of Justin Evans' career was his defensive production:...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Justin Evans, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Justin Evans shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.9 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 22 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 22 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 13 | 2 | - | 0 | - | 2 | 0 | 61.2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 13 | 85 | 5 | 0 | - | 6 | 0 | 61.2 |
Related Context
Justin Evans played DB for Texas A&M. Across 2 tracked seasons, Justin Evans recorded 87 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 17 primary output with 40.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
40.9
Usage
7.6
Consistency
41
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 2. UCLA: 3. Prairie View A&M: 2. Auburn: 1. Arkansas: 1. South Carolina: 1. Tennessee: 4. Alabama: 1. New Mexico State: 0. Mississippi State: 2. Ole Miss: 0. UTSA: 0. LSU: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 28.3. UCLA: 8 by 63.3. Prairie View A&M: 5 by 40.8. Auburn: 12 by 60. Arkansas: 8 by 43.3. South Carolina: 4 by 26.7. Tennessee: 11 by 85.8. Alabama: 4 by 26.7. New Mexico State: 3 by 12.5. Mississippi State: 11 by 65.8. Ole Miss: 12 by 50. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. LSU: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
85.8 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | L 28-33 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU | L 39-54 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTSA | W 23-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss10+ tackles | L 28-29 | 12 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Mississippi State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 28-35 | 11 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs New Mexico State | W 52-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Alabama | L 14-33 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee10+ tackles · Splash game | W 45-38 | 11 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ South Carolina | W 24-13 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas | W 45-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn10+ tackles | W 29-16 | 12 | 10 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Prairie View A&MSplash game | W 67-0 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLASplash game | W 31-24 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
Player Story
Justin Evans built his college career from 2015 through 2016 as a defensive back from Wiggins, MS wearing No. 14, spending time with Texas A&M. The clearest part of Justin Evans' career was his defensive production: 87 tackles, 5 tackles for loss, 5 interceptions, and 8 passes defended across 15 career games in the available record. His career also includes 474 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Justin Evans' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1 | 10 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1 | 10 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 17 | 40.9 | 7.6 | 16 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 17 | 40.9 | 7.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Tennessee
Week 6 · W 45-38 · Conference game
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Havoc Plays
93.3 takeover
4 disruption/tackle impact with 93.3 takeover score.
#2
@ Mississippi State
Week 10 · L 28-35 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
71.9 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 71.9 takeover score.
#3
vs UCLA
Week 1 · W 31-24
3
Havoc Plays
70.5 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 70.5 takeover score.
#4
@ LSU
Week 13 · L 7-19 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
60 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
@ Auburn
Week 3 · W 29-16 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
56.4 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
17 primary output · 40.9 efficiency · 7.6 usage
61.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
61.2
17 primary · 40.9 efficiency · 7.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Texas A&M
22
1 primary · 10 efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
5
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.