Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2015-2017Pittsburgh
Quadree Henderson
WR • 5'8" • 190 lbs • Wilmington, DE, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Quadree Henderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
49.7
Consistency
24
Season Value
37
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
1515161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quadree Henderson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Quadree Henderson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Quadree Henderson played WR for Pittsburgh. Across 3 tracked seasons, Quadree Henderson recorded 885 rushing yards, 473 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Pittsburgh.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 286 primary output with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 49.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
15.5
Efficiency
49.7
Usage
9.4
Consistency
24
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Youngstown State: 7. Penn State: 5. Oklahoma State: 74. Georgia Tech: 4. Rice: 31. Syracuse: 3. NC State: 2. Duke: 0. Virginia: 14. North Carolina: 10. Virginia Tech: 0. Miami: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Youngstown State: 1 by 46.7. Penn State: 2 by 16.7. Oklahoma State: 1 by 100. Georgia Tech: 2 by 13.3. Rice: 2 by 100. Syracuse: 1 by 20. NC State: 2 by 6.7. Virginia: 2 by 46.7. North Carolina: 1 by 66.7. Miami: 3 by 80
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins17.6 · Games = 5 · +3.6 vs Losses
Losses14 · Games = 7 · -3.6 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Miami | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 36 | 8.4 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Virginia Tech | L 14-20 | — | — | — | 13 | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/10 | vs North Carolina | L 31-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 8.3 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Virginia | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 14 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Duke | W 24-17 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs NC State | L 17-35 | — | 2 | 2 | 5.7 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Syracuse | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Rice | W 42-10 | — | 2 | 31 | 10 | 15.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Georgia Tech | L 17-35 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Oklahoma State | L 21-59 | — | 1 | 74 | 37.5 | 74 | 0 | 74 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Penn State | L 14-33 | — | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Youngstown State | W 28-21 | — | 1 | 7 | 8.4 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2015-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20152015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1 | 3.3 | 18.2 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1 | 3.3 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 286 | 71.2 | 18 | 285 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 286 | 71.2 | 18 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 186 | 49.7 | 9.4 | -100 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northwestern
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma State
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Pittsburgh
286 primary output · 71.2 efficiency · 18 usage
58.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
58.9
286 primary · 71.2 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
37
186 primary · 49.7 efficiency · 9.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
473
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Quadree Henderson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.