Player Dossier

2014-2019

Arkansas

Will Gragg

TE • 6'4" • 245 lbs • Dumas, AR, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

Will Gragg reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

7.1

Efficiency

51.2

Consistency

46.2

Season Value

51.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh

14151617181919

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Arkansas • Pittsburgh
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: LSU

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Will Gragg, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Will Gragg reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

Pittsburgh paired 146 primary output with 51.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 51.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, Pittsburgh.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

13.3

Efficiency

51.2

Usage

7.1

Consistency

46.2

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 5. Virginia: 4. Ohio: 38. Penn State: -1. UCF: 20. Unknown: 10. Syracuse: 6. Miami: 11. Georgia Tech: 8. North Carolina: 26. Boston College: 19

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Virginia: 3 by 8.9. Ohio: 4 by 63.3. Penn State: 1 by 0. UCF: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Syracuse: 1 by 40. Miami: 1 by 73.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 53.3. North Carolina: 3 by 57.8. Boston College: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Wins17.2 · n=6 · +8.9 vs Losses
Losses8.3 · n=4 · -8.9 vs Wins
First Half12.7 · n=6 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half14 · n=5 · +1.3 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Ohio

Best efficiency game

100 vs Boston College

Result
Fri 12/27@ Eastern MichiganW 34-30155505
Sat 11/30vs Boston CollegeL 19-261191919019
Fri 11/15vs North CarolinaW 34-273268.78.70013
Sat 11/2@ Georgia TechW 20-10188808
Sat 10/26vs MiamiL 12-161111111011
Fri 10/18@ SyracuseW 27-20166606
Sat 9/28vs Unknown1101010010
Sat 9/21vs UCFW 35-342201010011
Sat 9/14@ Penn StateL 10-171-1-1-10-1
Sat 9/7vs OhioW 20-104389.59.50011
Sat 8/31vs VirginiaL 14-30341.31.3006

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Arkansas

    2014-2017

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Pittsburgh

    2018-2019

    Final stop

Season Progression

2014201520162017201820192019
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2014 Regular SeasonArkansas0
2015 Regular SeasonArkansas00
2016 Regular SeasonArkansas00
2017 Regular SeasonArkansas6164.49.961
2018 Regular SeasonPittsburgh3137.812.4-30
2019 PostseasonPittsburgh14651.27.1115
2019 Regular SeasonPittsburgh14651.27.10

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

LSU

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

47

Primary metric

47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Ohio

38

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

38 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.

#3

UCF

21

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.

#4

Boston College

19

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

North Carolina

26

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

26 receiving yards with a 57.8 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh

146 primary output · 51.2 efficiency · 7.1 usage

51.1

#2

2019 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

51.1

146 primary · 51.2 efficiency · 7.1 usage

#3

2017 Regular Season · Arkansas

37.1

61 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 9.9 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2015 · Rating 0.9196

Dumas · Dumas, AR

Committed To
Arkansas
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2015

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

238

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Will Gragg quick answers

Recruiting profile

4-star recruit

Position
TE
Teams played for
2
Seasons tracked
7
Career receiving yards
238