Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2014-2019Pittsburgh
TE • 6'4" • 245 lbs • Dumas, AR, USA
Will Gragg reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.1
Efficiency
51.2
Consistency
46.2
Season Value
51.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Gragg, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Will Gragg reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Will Gragg played TE for Arkansas and Pittsburgh. Across 6 tracked seasons, Will Gragg recorded 238 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 146 primary output with 51.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 51.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arkansas, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
13.3
Efficiency
51.2
Usage
7.1
Consistency
46.2
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 5. Virginia: 4. Ohio: 38. Penn State: -1. UCF: 20. Unknown: 10. Syracuse: 6. Miami: 11. Georgia Tech: 8. North Carolina: 26. Boston College: 19
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 33.3. Virginia: 3 by 8.9. Ohio: 4 by 63.3. Penn State: 1 by 0. UCF: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Syracuse: 1 by 40. Miami: 1 by 73.3. Georgia Tech: 1 by 53.3. North Carolina: 3 by 57.8. Boston College: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 34-30 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Boston College | L 19-26 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 11/15 | vs North Carolina | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Georgia Tech | W 20-10 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Miami | L 12-16 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 10/18 | @ Syracuse | W 27-20 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs UCF | W 35-34 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Penn State | L 10-17 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | -1 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Ohio | W 20-10 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Virginia | L 14-30 | — | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 1.30 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2014-2017
Opening stop
Pittsburgh
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas | 61 | 64.4 | 9.9 | 61 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 31 | 37.8 | 12.4 | -30 |
| 2019 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 146 | 51.2 | 7.1 | 115 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 146 | 51.2 | 7.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47
Primary metric
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#3
UCF
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Carolina
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 57.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Pittsburgh
146 primary output · 51.2 efficiency · 7.1 usage
51.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
51.1
146 primary · 51.2 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Arkansas
37.1
61 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 9.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9196
Dumas · Dumas, AR
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
238
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.