Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2008-2011Air Force
RB • 5'8" • Lawrenceville, GA, USA
Asher Clark leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 66.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
20.8
Efficiency
66.5
Consistency
76.5
Season Value
65.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Air Force
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Asher Clark, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Air Force. Asher Clark leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 66.5 efficiency.
Asher Clark played RB for Air Force. Across 4 tracked seasons, Asher Clark recorded 3,594 rushing yards, 81 receiving yards, and 24 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Air Force.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Air Force paired 1,143 primary output with 66.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 66.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with 169 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
87.9
Efficiency
66.5
Usage
20.8
Consistency
76.5
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 16. South Dakota: 97. TCU: 46. Tennessee State: 148. Navy: 94. Notre Dame: 102. San Diego State: 100. Boise State: 23. New Mexico: 75. Army: 78. Wyoming: 84. UNLV: 169. Colorado State: 111
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 14 by 12.1. South Dakota: 13 by 77.7. TCU: 7 by 68.5. Tennessee State: 13 by 97.4. Navy: 10 by 89.2. Notre Dame: 11 by 88.6. San Diego State: 20 by 49. Boise State: 11 by 21.8. New Mexico: 10 by 78.1. Army: 16 by 50.8. Wyoming: 18 by 48.6. UNLV: 15 by 96.9. Colorado State: 13 by 85.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
97.4 vs Tennessee State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | vs Toledo | L 41-42 | 12 | 14 | 1.20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.1 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Colorado State100 rush yards | W 45-21 | 13 | 111 | 8.50 | 1 | — | — | 8.5 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UNLV100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-17 | 15 | 169 | 11.30 | 1 | — | — | 11.3 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Wyoming | L 17-25 | 18 | 84 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Army | W 24-14 | 16 | 78 | 4.90 | 0 | — | — | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ New Mexico | W 42-0 | 10 | 75 | 7.50 | 0 | — | — | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Boise State | L 26-37 | 11 | 23 | 2.10 | 1 | — | — | 2.1 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs San Diego State | L 27-41 | 16 | 72 | 4.50 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 5 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Notre Dame100 rush yards | L 33-59 | 11 | 102 | 9.30 | 0 | — | — | 9.3 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Navy2+ TD | W 35-34 | 8 | 91 | 11.40 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9.4 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tennessee State100 rush yards | W 63-24 | 13 | 148 | 11.40 | 1 | — | — | 11.4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs TCU | L 19-35 | 7 | 46 | 6.60 | 0 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs South Dakota | W 37-20 | 13 | 97 | 7.50 | 0 | — | — | 7.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Air Force | 588 | 43 | 21.3 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Air Force | 588 | 43 | 21.3 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Air Force | 906 | 58 | 17.3 | 318 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 906 | 58 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 1,038 | 56.8 | 22.9 | 132 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 1,038 | 56.8 | 22.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 1,143 | 66.5 | 20.8 | 105 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 1,143 | 66.5 | 20.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with 169 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
169
Primary metric
169 scrimmage yards and 23.8 usage.
#2
Colorado State
136
Primary metric
Win with 136 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
136 scrimmage yards and 28.6 usage.
#3
UNLV
160
Primary metric
Win with 160 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
160 scrimmage yards and 23.1 usage.
#4
Colorado State
125
Primary metric
Win with 125 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
125 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#5
Tennessee State
148
Primary metric
Win with 148 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
148 scrimmage yards and 16.7 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Air Force
1,143 primary output · 66.5 efficiency · 20.8 usage
65.9
#2
2011 Regular Season · Air Force
65.9
1,143 primary · 66.5 efficiency · 20.8 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Air Force
62.4
1,038 primary · 56.8 efficiency · 22.9 usage
11
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
6
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,675
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.