Usage Score
15.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Ohio
Tyler Futrell
WR • 6'0" • Altoona, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tyler Futrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.9
Consistency
56.9
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Ohio
0910111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Futrell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Ohio. Tyler Futrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Ohio paired 422 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Ohio
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
46.9
Efficiency
78.9
Usage
15.8
Consistency
56.9
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 133. Penn State: 20. New Mexico State: 50. Marshall: 42. Buffalo: 15. Miami (OH): 24. Eastern Michigan: 17. Ball State: 59. Kent State: 62
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 5 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 66.7. New Mexico State: 1 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 56. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 80. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 28.3. Ball State: 5 by 78.7. Kent State: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins46.2 · n=6 · -2.2 vs Losses
Losses48.3 · n=3 · +2.2 vs Wins
First Half52 · n=5 · +11.5 vs Second Half
Second Half40.5 · n=4 · -11.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
100 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | @ UL Monroe100 receiving yards | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 133 | 26.6 | 26.60 | 0 | 44 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Kent State | L 6-28 | — | 3 | 62 | 13 | 20.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Ball State | L 27-52 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 11/1 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 45-14 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Miami (OH) | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Buffalo | W 38-31 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Marshall | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New Mexico State | W 51-24 | — | 1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Penn State | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 90 | 80 | 5.5 | 90 |
| 2012 Postseason | Ohio | 422 | 78.9 | 15.8 | 332 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 422 | 78.9 | 15.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133
Primary metric
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Ohio
422 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 15.8 usage
62.9
#2
2012 Regular Season · Ohio
62.9
422 primary · 78.9 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
46.9
90 primary · 80 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7
Altoona · Altoona, PA
- Committed To
- Ohio
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
512
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.