Usage Score
15.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Ohio
WR • 6'0" • Altoona, PA, USA
Tyler Futrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.8
Efficiency
78.9
Consistency
56.9
Season Value
62.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Futrell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Ohio. Tyler Futrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyler Futrell played WR for Ohio. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tyler Futrell recorded -10 rushing yards, 512 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Ohio paired 422 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
46.9
Efficiency
78.9
Usage
15.8
Consistency
56.9
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 133. Penn State: 20. New Mexico State: 50. Marshall: 42. Buffalo: 15. Miami (OH): 24. Eastern Michigan: 17. Ball State: 59. Kent State: 62
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 5 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 66.7. New Mexico State: 1 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 56. Buffalo: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 2 by 80. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 28.3. Ball State: 5 by 78.7. Kent State: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
100 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | @ UL Monroe100 receiving yards | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 133 | 26.6 | 26.60 | 0 | 44 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Kent State | L 6-28 | — | 3 | 62 | 13 | 20.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Ball State | L 27-52 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 11/1 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 45-14 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Miami (OH) | L 20-23 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Buffalo | W 38-31 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Marshall | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New Mexico State | W 51-24 | — | 1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Penn State | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio | 90 | 80 | 5.5 | 90 |
| 2012 Postseason | Ohio | 422 | 78.9 | 15.8 | 332 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio | 422 | 78.9 | 15.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133
Primary metric
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Central Michigan
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Ohio
422 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 15.8 usage
62.9
#2
2012 Regular Season · Ohio
62.9
422 primary · 78.9 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Ohio
46.9
90 primary · 80 efficiency · 5.5 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7
Altoona · Altoona, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
512
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.