Usage Score
27.4
Player Dossier
2008-2010Kentucky
WR • 5'11" • Alcoa, TN, USA
Randall Cobb reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.4
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
66.1
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Randall Cobb, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Kentucky. Randall Cobb reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Kentucky paired 1,017 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
78.2
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
27.4
Consistency
66.1
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 62. Louisville: 19. Western Kentucky: 98. Akron: 43. Florida: 67. Ole Miss: 108. Auburn: 68. South Carolina: 63. Georgia: 45. Mississippi State: 171. Unknown: 101. Vanderbilt: 56. Tennessee: 116
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 5 by 82.7. Louisville: 2 by 63.3. Western Kentucky: 5 by 100. Akron: 5 by 57.3. Florida: 7 by 63.8. Ole Miss: 6 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 64.8. South Carolina: 8 by 52.5. Georgia: 7 by 42.9. Mississippi State: 12 by 95. Unknown: 4 by 100. Vanderbilt: 3 by 100. Tennessee: 13 by 59.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | vs Pittsburgh | L 10-27 | — | 5 | 62 | 10.6 | 12.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-24 | — | 13 | 116 | 7.8 | 8.90 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Vanderbilt | W 38-20 | — | 3 | 56 | 17.4 | 18.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 4 | 101 | 25.3 | 25.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Mississippi State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-24 | — | 12 | 171 | 10.7 | 14.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Georgia | L 31-44 | — | 7 | 45 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs South CarolinaHigh volume | W 31-28 | — | 8 | 63 | 5.6 | 7.90 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Auburn | L 34-37 | — | 7 | 68 | 6.4 | 9.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Ole Miss100 receiving yards | L 35-42 | — | 6 | 108 | 14.8 | 18 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Florida | L 14-48 | — | 7 | 67 | 7.8 | 9.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Akron | W 47-10 | — | 5 | 43 | 7.5 | 8.60 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Western Kentucky | W 63-28 | — | 5 | 98 | 13.8 | 19.60 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Louisville | W 23-16 | — | 2 | 19 | 16.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kentucky
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Kentucky | 197 | 61.4 | 21.8 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Kentucky | 447 | 70.3 | 23.8 | 250 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Kentucky | 447 | 70.3 | 23.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Kentucky | 1,017 | 75.5 | 27.4 | 570 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Kentucky | 1,017 | 75.5 | 27.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
171
Primary metric
171 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#4
Ole Miss
108
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
101
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Kentucky
1,017 primary output · 75.5 efficiency · 27.4 usage
60
#2
2010 Regular Season · Kentucky
60
1,017 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 27.4 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Kentucky
42.9
447 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 23.8 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8467
Alcoa · Alcoa, TN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,661
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Randall Cobb quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit