Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Pittsburgh
WR • 6'5" • North Huntingdon, PA, USA
Mike Shanahan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.6
Efficiency
87.7
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
70.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Shanahan, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Mike Shanahan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mike Shanahan played WR for Pittsburgh. Across 4 tracked seasons, Mike Shanahan recorded 2,276 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 983 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Gardner-Webb
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.6
Efficiency
87.7
Usage
24.6
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
Gardner-Webb
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 57. Youngstown State: 54. Cincinnati: 59. Virginia Tech: 111. Gardner-Webb: 144. Syracuse: 83. Louisville: 74. Buffalo: 39. Temple: 67. Notre Dame: 38. UConn: 79. Rutgers: 62. South Florida: 116
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 4 by 95. Youngstown State: 6 by 60. Cincinnati: 5 by 78.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 100. Gardner-Webb: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Temple: 6 by 74.4. Notre Dame: 4 by 63.3. UConn: 3 by 100. Rutgers: 5 by 82.7. South Florida: 9 by 85.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Gardner-Webb
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/5 | @ Ole Miss | L 17-38 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sun 12/2 | @ South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-3 | — | 9 | 116 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Rutgers | W 27-6 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UConn | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 79 | 26.3 | 26.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Notre Dame | L 26-29 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Temple | W 47-17 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Buffalo | W 20-6 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisville | L 35-45 | — | 4 | 74 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Fri 10/5 | @ Syracuse | L 13-14 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Gardner-Webb100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 55-10 | — | 5 | 144 | 28.8 | 28.80 | 2 | 77 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Virginia Tech100 receiving yards | W 35-17 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 1 | 40 |
| Fri 9/7 | @ Cincinnati | L 10-34 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Youngstown State | L 17-31 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 211 | 83.9 | 14.4 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 211 | 83.9 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 589 | 82.1 | 19.3 | 378 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 589 | 82.1 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 493 | 71.8 | 15.9 | -96 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 493 | 71.8 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 983 | 87.7 | 24.6 | 490 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 983 | 87.7 | 24.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
North Carolina
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
82
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Gardner-Webb
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
983 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 24.6 usage
70.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
70.6
983 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
58.2
589 primary · 82.1 efficiency · 19.3 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,276
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.