Usage Score
24.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Minnesota
QB • 6'4" • Indianapolis, IN, USA
MarQueis Gray is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
24.6
Efficiency
56
Consistency
18.1
Season Value
33.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
MarQueis Gray, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Minnesota. MarQueis Gray is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
MarQueis Gray played QB for Minnesota. Across 4 tracked seasons, MarQueis Gray recorded 2,053 passing yards, 1,731 rushing yards, and 766 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 2,461 primary output with 59.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
78.4
Efficiency
56
Usage
24.6
Consistency
18.1
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 67. UNLV: 337. New Hampshire: 209. Western Michigan: 86. Northwestern: 152. Wisconsin: 0. Purdue: 0. Michigan: 0. Illinois: 0. Nebraska: 7. Michigan State: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 14 by 52.3. UNLV: 47 by 64.5. New Hampshire: 25 by 84.8. Western Michigan: 17 by 60.5. Northwestern: 20 by 68.2. Nebraska: 2 by 35. Michigan State: 6 by 27
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
84.8 vs New Hampshire
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | @ Texas TechDual-threat | L 31-34 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 52.3 | 11 | 59 | 5.40 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan State | L 10-26 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 5 | 4 | 0.80 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Nebraska | L 14-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 35 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 2 | 6 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Illinois | W 17-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Michigan | L 13-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Purdue | W 44-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Wisconsin | L 13-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs NorthwesternDual-threat | L 13-21 | 7 | 11 | 66 | 63.6 | 0 | 1 | 68.2 | 9 | 86 | 9.60 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Western MichiganDual-threat | W 28-23 | 3 | 6 | 29 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 60.5 | 11 | 57 | 5.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New Hampshire3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 44-7 | 6 | 8 | 100 | 75.0 | 2 | 0 | 84.8 | 17 | 109 | 6.40 | 2 | 75 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ UNLVDual-threat | W 30-27 | 17 | 30 | 269 | 56.7 | 2 | 1 | 64.5 | 17 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Minnesota | 327 | 45.2 | 12.6 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 327 | 45.2 | 12.6 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 134 | 43.1 | 21 | -193 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,461 | 59.7 | 44.7 | 2,327 |
| 2012 Postseason | Minnesota | 862 | 56 | 24.6 | -1,599 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Minnesota | 862 | 56 | 24.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
132
Primary metric
132 total offense with 82 efficiency.
#2
Miami (OH)
334
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
334 total offense with 71.4 efficiency.
#3
Michigan State
366
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
366 total offense with 61.3 efficiency.
#4
UNLV
337
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
337 total offense with 64.5 efficiency.
#5
New Mexico State
321
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
321 total offense with 61.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Minnesota
2,461 primary output · 59.7 efficiency · 44.7 usage
69.5
#2
2012 Postseason · Minnesota
33.4
862 primary · 56 efficiency · 24.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Minnesota
33.4
862 primary · 56 efficiency · 24.6 usage
2
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
15
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9185
Ben Davis · Indianapolis, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,784
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.