Usage Score
22.5
Player Dossier
2015-2019Mississippi State
QB • 6'5" • 235 lbs • Indianapolis, IN, USA
Tommy Stevens is a balanced quarterback profile with 22.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
22.5
Efficiency
59.8
Consistency
66.2
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tommy Stevens, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Mississippi State. Tommy Stevens is a balanced quarterback profile with 22.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Tommy Stevens played QB for Penn State and Mississippi State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Tommy Stevens recorded 1,459 passing yards, 887 rushing yards, and 62 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Mississippi State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 1,536 primary output with 59.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 59.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Penn State, Mississippi State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
170.7
Efficiency
59.8
Usage
22.5
Consistency
66.2
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 292. Louisiana: 273. Southern Miss: 105. Kansas State: 105. Auburn: -9. Tennessee: 93. Arkansas: 246. Alabama: 178. Abilene Christian: 253
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 43 by 69.5. Louisiana: 41 by 66.5. Southern Miss: 16 by 69.4. Kansas State: 22 by 39. Auburn: 4 by 38.2. Tennessee: 20 by 40.4. Arkansas: 33 by 73.9. Alabama: 31 by 66.7. Abilene Christian: 34 by 74.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
74.8 vs Abilene Christian
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/30 | @ Louisville3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 28-38 | 17 | 26 | 221 | 65.4 | 2 | 0 | 69.5 | 17 | 71 | 4.20 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Abilene Christian3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 45-7 | 13 | 27 | 165 | 48.1 | 2 | 0 | 74.8 | 7 | 88 | 12.60 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs AlabamaDual-threat | L 7-38 | 12 | 21 | 82 | 57.1 | 0 | 1 | 66.7 | 10 | 96 | 9.60 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ ArkansasDual-threat | W 54-24 | 12 | 18 | 172 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 73.9 | 15 | 74 | 4.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Tennessee | L 10-20 | 6 | 11 | 67 | 54.5 | 0 | 2 | 40.4 | 9 | 26 | 2.90 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Auburn | L 23-56 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 38.2 | 1 | -16 | -16 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kansas State | L 24-31 | 7 | 15 | 100 | 46.7 | 1 | 2 | 39 | 7 | 5 | 0.70 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Southern Miss | W 38-15 | 9 | 10 | 105 | 90.0 | 2 | 0 | 69.4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Louisiana3+ TD | W 38-28 | 20 | 30 | 236 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 66.5 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 1 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Mississippi State
2019
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Penn State | 234 | 77.1 | 8.7 | 234 |
| 2017 Postseason | Penn State | 348 | 70.8 | 11.7 | 114 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Penn State | 348 | 70.8 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 228 | 57.7 | 15.8 | -120 |
| 2019 Postseason | Mississippi State | 1,536 | 59.8 | 22.5 | 1,308 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1,536 | 59.8 | 22.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
292
Primary metric
292 total offense with 69.5 efficiency.
#2
Iowa
70
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
70 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Rutgers
61
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
61 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
Indiana
23
Primary metric
Win with 23 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
23 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#5
Maryland
124
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
124 total offense with 62.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Mississippi State
1,536 primary output · 59.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
62.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Mississippi State
62.1
1,536 primary · 59.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Penn State
41.9
234 primary · 77.1 efficiency · 8.7 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
4
3+ TD games
20
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,346
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.