Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2008-2010Ohio
QB • 6'1" • Gardena, CA, USA
Boo Jackson is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
27.8
Efficiency
56.6
Consistency
73.9
Season Value
60.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Boo Jackson, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Ohio. Boo Jackson is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Boo Jackson played QB for Ohio. Across 3 tracked seasons, Boo Jackson recorded 4,446 passing yards, 699 rushing yards, and 68 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Ohio.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Ohio paired 2,688 primary output with 62.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
172.5
Efficiency
56.6
Usage
27.8
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 229. Wofford: 112. Toledo: 156. Ohio State: 73. Marshall: 178. Eastern Michigan: 278. Bowling Green: 129. Akron: 171. Miami (OH): 180. Louisiana: 314. Buffalo: 201. Temple: 94. Kent State: 127
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 31 by 62.6. Wofford: 21 by 52.3. Toledo: 40 by 43.9. Ohio State: 11 by 61.9. Marshall: 30 by 55.6. Eastern Michigan: 37 by 66.9. Bowling Green: 24 by 65.6. Akron: 27 by 57. Miami (OH): 31 by 55.7. Louisiana: 33 by 64.5. Buffalo: 26 by 65.3. Temple: 20 by 43.5. Kent State: 46 by 41.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana
Best efficiency game
66.9 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/19 | @ Troy3+ TD | L 21-48 | 14 | 21 | 209 | 66.7 | 3 | 1 | 62.6 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 24 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ Kent State | L 6-28 | 14 | 26 | 133 | 53.8 | 0 | 2 | 41.4 | 20 | -6 | -0.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 11/17 | @ Temple | W 31-23 | 4 | 12 | 78 | 33.3 | 1 | 1 | 43.5 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 11/4 | vs Buffalo3+ TD | W 34-17 | 13 | 19 | 175 | 68.4 | 2 | 1 | 65.3 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Louisiana3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-31 | 16 | 22 | 240 | 72.7 | 3 | 4 | 64.5 | 11 | 74 | 6.70 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Miami (OH) | W 34-13 | 10 | 19 | 149 | 52.6 | 0 | 1 | 55.7 | 12 | 31 | 2.60 | 2 | 14 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Akron3+ TD | W 38-10 | 14 | 21 | 161 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 57 | 6 | 10 | 1.70 | 2 | 7 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Bowling Green3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 49-25 | 9 | 14 | 76 | 64.3 | 3 | 0 | 65.6 | 10 | 53 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Eastern MichiganDual-threat | W 30-17 | 15 | 24 | 218 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 66.9 | 13 | 60 | 4.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Marshall | L 23-24 | 11 | 20 | 155 | 55.0 | 2 | 1 | 55.6 | 10 | 23 | 2.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Ohio State | L 7-43 | 5 | 8 | 69 | 62.5 | 1 | 0 | 61.9 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Toledo | L 13-20 | 17 | 27 | 137 | 63.0 | 1 | 3 | 43.9 | 13 | 19 | 1.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Wofford | W 33-10 | 7 | 12 | 97 | 58.3 | 0 | 1 | 52.3 | 9 | 15 | 1.70 | 1 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Ohio | 2,688 | 62.1 | 28.3 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio | 215 | 56.3 | 26.1 | -2,473 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio | 2,242 | 56.6 | 27.8 | 2,027 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio | 2,242 | 56.6 | 27.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with 413 yards of offense and 76.6 efficiency.
413
Primary metric
413 total offense with 76.6 efficiency.
#2
Louisiana
314
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
314 total offense with 64.5 efficiency.
#3
Buffalo
360
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
360 total offense with 79.1 efficiency.
#4
Eastern Michigan
278
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
278 total offense with 66.9 efficiency.
#5
UConn
137
Primary metric
Loss with 137 yards of offense and 59.9 efficiency.
137 total offense with 59.9 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Regular Season · Ohio
2,688 primary output · 62.1 efficiency · 28.3 usage
65.6
#2
2010 Postseason · Ohio
60.4
2,242 primary · 56.6 efficiency · 27.8 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Ohio
60.4
2,242 primary · 56.6 efficiency · 27.8 usage
3
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
10
3+ TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
5,145
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.