Usage Score
27.2
Player Dossier
2008-2010Air Force
Kyle Halderman
WR • 5'11" • Katy, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kyle Halderman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.9
Consistency
53.4
Season Value
66.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Air Force
0808091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Halderman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Air Force. Kyle Halderman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kyle Halderman played WR for Air Force. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kyle Halderman recorded 628 rushing yards, 618 receiving yards, and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Air Force.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Air Force paired 290 primary output with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Air Force
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
22.3
Efficiency
83.9
Usage
27.2
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 36. Northwestern State: 43. BYU: 23. Oklahoma: 0. Wyoming: 0. Navy: 0. Colorado State: 24. San Diego State: 41. TCU: 8. Utah: 67. Army: 0. New Mexico: 40. UNLV: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 4 by 60. Northwestern State: 2 by 100. BYU: 1 by 100. Colorado State: 1 by 100. San Diego State: 2 by 100. TCU: 1 by 53.3. Utah: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 88.9. UNLV: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins19.3 · Games = 9 · -9.7 vs Losses
Losses29 · Games = 4 · +9.7 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/27 | @ Georgia Tech | W 14-7 | — | 4 | 36 | 7.3 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/19 | @ UNLV | W 35-20 | — | 1 | 8 | 5.7 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs New Mexico | W 48-23 | — | 3 | 40 | 9.5 | 13.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Army | W 42-22 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Utah | L 23-28 | — | 3 | 67 | 12.5 | 22.30 | 1 | 49 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ TCU | L 7-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 12.2 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/17 | @ San Diego State | L 25-27 | — | 2 | 41 | 13 | 20.50 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Colorado State | W 49-27 | — | 1 | 24 | 13 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Navy | W 14-6 | — | — | — | 4.4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Wyoming | W 20-14 | — | — | — | 4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Oklahoma | L 24-27 | — | — | — | 7.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs BYU | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 23 | 13 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Northwestern State | W 65-21 | — | 2 | 43 | 19.3 | 21.50 | 1 | 29 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20082008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Air Force | 266 | 80.6 | 23.7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Air Force | 266 | 80.6 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 62 | 76.7 | 28.6 | -204 |
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 290 | 83.9 | 27.2 | 228 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 290 | 83.9 | 27.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54
Primary metric
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern State
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Air Force
290 primary output · 83.9 efficiency · 27.2 usage
66.1
#2
2010 Regular Season · Air Force
66.1
290 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 27.2 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Air Force
55.4
266 primary · 80.6 efficiency · 23.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
618
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Kyle Halderman
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.